Requirement for Consent
[Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893)]
1
Notice the phrase “This right of domicile. . .is not established unless the person makes sufficiently known his intention 2 of fixing there, either tacitly or by an express declaration.” 3 16. The process of notifying the government that you have nominated them as your protector occurs based on how you fill 4 out usually government and financial forms such as: 5 16.1. Driver’s license applications. You cannot get a driver’s license in most states without selecting a domicile in the 6 place that you want the license from. See: 7 Defending Your Right to Travel , Form #06.010 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 16.2. Voter registration. You cannot register to vote without a domicile in the place you are voting. 8 16.3. Jury summons. You cannot serve as a jurist without a domicile in the jurisdiction you are serving in. 9 16.4. Financial forms. Any form that asks for your “residence”, “permanent address”, or “domicile”. 10 16.5. Tax withholding forms. 11 17. Tax liability originates from one’s choice of legal domicile and the obligation to pay for “protection” that attaches to 12 that domicile: 13
“ domicile. A person's legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning. Smith v. Smith, 206 Pa.Super. 310, 213 A.2d. 94. Generally, physical presence within a state and the intention to make it one's home are the requisites of establishing a “ domicile ” therein. The permanent residence of a person or the place to which he intends to return even though he may actually reside elsewhere. A person may have more than one residence but only one domicile. The legal domicile of a person is important since it, rather than the actual residence, often controls the jurisdiction of the taxing authorities and determines where a person may
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
exercise the privilege of voting and other legal rights and privileges. ”
21
[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 485]
22
“ Thus, the Court has frequently held that domicile or residence, more substantial than mere presence in transit or sojourn, is an adequate basis for taxation, including income, property, and death taxes . Since the Fourteenth Amendment makes one a citizen of the state wherein he resides, the fact of residence creates universally reciprocal duties of protection by the state and of allegiance and support by the citizen. The latter obviously includes a duty to pay taxes, and their nature and measure is largely a political matter . Of course, the situs of property may tax it regardless of the citizenship, domicile, or residence of the owner, the most
23
24
25
26
27
28
obvious illustration being a tax on realty laid by the state in which the realty is located. ”
29
[Miller Brothers Co. v. Maryland, 347 U.S. 340 (1954)]
30
18. The U.S. Supreme Court has, in fact, held that those WITHOUT a domicile within a jurisdiction and who are therefore 31 nonresidents and who become the target of tax enforcement by a legislatively “foreign” jurisdiction that they are not 32 domiciled within are the victims of EXTORTION, and possibly even crime: 33
"The power of taxation, indispensable to the existence of every civilized government, is exercised upon the assumption of an equivalent rendered to the taxpayer in the protection of his person and property, in adding to the value of such property , or in the creation and maintenance of public conveniences in which he shares -- such, for instance, as roads, bridges, sidewalks, pavements, and schools for the education of his children. If the taxing power be in no position to render these services, or otherwise to benefit the person or property taxed, and such property be wholly within the taxing power of another state, to which it may be said to owe an allegiance, and to which it looks for protection, the taxation of such property within the domicil of the owner partakes rather of the nature of an extortion than a tax , and has been repeatedly held by this Court to be beyond the power of the legislature, and a taking of property without due process of law. Railroad Company v. Jackson, 7 Wall. 262; State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds, 15 Wall. 300; Tappan v. Merchants' National Bank, 19 Wall. 490, 499; Delaware &c. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 198 U.S. 341, 358. In Chicago &c. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, it was held, after full consideration, that the taking of private property [199 U.S. 203] without compensation was a denial of due process within the Fourteenth Amendment. See also Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U.S. 97, 102; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Nebraska, 164 U.S. 403, 417; Mt. Hope Cemetery
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
v. Boston, 158 Mass. 509, 519. "
48
[Union Refrigerator Transit Company v. Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194 (1905)]
49
19. If you want provide unambiguous legal notice to the state of your choice to disassociate with them and become a 50 “transient foreigner” in the place where you live who is not subject to the civil laws, you can use the following free 51 form: 52 Legal Notice of Change in Domicile/Citizenship Records and Divorce from the United States , Form #10.001 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Requirement for Consent
169 of 396
Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013
EXHIBIT:________
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online