Requirement for Consent

We emphasize that there is no method OTHER than domicile available in which to consent to the civil laws of a specific 1 place. None of the following conditions, for instance, may form a basis for a prima facie presumption that a specific human 2 being consented to be civilly governed by a specific municipal government: 3 1. Simply being born and thereby becoming a statutory “national” (per 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21)) of a specific country is 4 NOT an exercise of personal discretion or an express act of consent. 5 2. Simply living in a physical place WITHOUT choosing a domicile there is NOT an exercise of personal discretion or an 6 express act of consent. 7

The subject of domicile is a complicated one. Consequently, we have written a separate memorandum of law on the subject 8 if you would like to investigate this fascinating subject further: 9

Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent , Form #05.002 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

9.4 Consent circumscribes the legislative boundary between FOREIGN and DOMESTIC 10

The U.S. Supreme Court described how legal entities and persons transition from being FOREIGN to DOMESTIC in 11 relation to a specific court or venue, which is ONLY with their express consent. This process of giving consent is also 12 called a "waiver of sovereign immunity" and it applies equally to governments, states, and the humans occupying them. To 13 wit: 14

Before we can proceed in this cause we must, therefore, inquire whether we can hear and determine the matters in controversy between the parties, who are two states of this Union, sovereign within their respective boundaries, save that portion of power which they have granted to the federal government, and foreign to each other for all but federal purposes. So they have been considered by this Court, through a long series of years and cases, to the present term; during which, in the case of The Bank of the United States v. Daniels, this Court has declared this to be a fundamental principle of the constitution; and so we shall consider it in deciding Those states, in their highest sovereign capacity, in the convention of the people thereof; on whom, by the revolution, the prerogative of the crown, and the transcendant power of parliament devolved, in a plenitude unimpaired by any act, and controllable by no authority, 6 Wheat. 651; 8 Wheat. 584, 88; adopted the constitution, by which they respectively made to the United States a grant of judicial power over controversies between two or more states. By the constitution, it was ordained that this judicial power, in cases where a state was a party, should be exercised by this Court as one of original jurisdiction. The states waived their exemption from judicial power, 6 Wheat. 378, 80, as sovereigns by original and inherent right, by their own grant of its exercise over themselves in such cases, but which they would not grant to any inferior tribunal. By this grant, this Court has acquired jurisdiction over the parties in this cause, by their own consent and delegated authority; as their agent for executing the judicial power of the United States in the cases specified. on the present motion. 2 Peters, 590, 91.

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

[The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants v. the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,

32

Defendant, 37 U.S. 657, 12 Pet. 657, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838)]

33

The idea of the above cite is that all civil subject matters or powers by any government NOT expressly consented to by the 34 object of those powers are foreign and therefore outside the civil legal jurisdiction of that government. This fact is 35 recognized in the Declaration of Independence, which states that all just powers derive from the CONSENT of those 36 governed. The method of providing that consent , in the case of a human, is to select a civil domicile within a specific 37 government and thereby nominate a protector under the civil statutory laws of the territory protected by that government. 38 This fact is recognized in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b), which says that the capacity to sue or be sued is 39 determined by the law of the domicile of the party. Civil statutory laws from places or governments OUTSIDE the domicile 40 of the party may therefore NOT be enforced by a court against the party. This subject is covered further in: 41

Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent , Form #05.002 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

A very important aspect of domicile is that whether one is domestic and a citizen or foreign and an “non -resident non- 42 person” under the civil statutory laws is determined SOLELY by one's domicile, and NOT their nationality. You can be 43 born anywhere in America and yet still be a statutory “non -resident non- person” in relation to any and every state or 44 government within America simply by not choosing or having a domicile within any municipal government in the country. 45

Requirement for Consent

170 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________