Requirement for Consent

(iii)evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or

1

other object, in an official proceeding; or

2

(iv)be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been summoned by legal process; or

3

(C)hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;

4

5

6

shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).

7

If you want to win ANY and EVERY battle against the government in court, all you have to do is be the FIRST to define 8 the words using the techniques in this section, and to turn their own form against them to make THEM the franchisee and 9 YOU the grantor of the franchise. Since you are signing the form under penalty of perjury, they can’t tell you what to put 10 on it or they are criminally tampering with and threatening a protected witness. If they don’t like the terms of YOUR offer, 11 then all they can do is respond by saying YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE to participate in THEIR franchise or to receive the 12 Mark of the Beast, the Social Security Number. You can even define a non-response in your offer as a statement by them 13 that YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE. Then you can tell everyone who wants such a number that the government says you are 14 NOT eligible, and therefore, that they cannot demand the Mark of the Beast. Hurt me! 15 Finally, they can’t respond to the tactics suggested in this section by saying that you can’t use them, because these are 16 EXACTLY the same tactics the GOVERNMENT uses and if they deny you the ability to use them, then under the concept 17 of equal protection and equal treatment, they HAVE to deny THEMSELVES the SAME ability. 18

You should view EVERY opportunity to fill out any government form as an act of contracting away your God given, 19 unalienable rights and to thereby become INFERIOR and UNEQUAL in relation to the pagan government. 20

12 A Breach of Contract 78

21

Imagine that you have agreed with an auto dealer to purchase the luxurious Belchfire X-1 automobile, for which you agree 22 to pay $45,000, with monthly payments to extend over a period of three years. You sign the sales agreement, and are then 23 told to return the following day to sign the formal contract, which you do. When you arrive two days later to pick up the 24 car, the dealer presents you with the title and keys to a much lesser model, the Klunkermobile J. When you ask the dealer to 25 explain the switch, he points to a provision in the contract that reads: "Dealer shall be entitled to make ‘reasonable’ 26 adjustments it considers to be ‘necessary and proper’ to further the ‘general welfare’ of the parties hereto." He also tells you 27 that the amount of the payments will remain the same as for the Belchfire X-1; that to provide otherwise would be to impair 28 the obligations of the contract. You strongly object, arguing that the dealer is making a fundamental alteration of the 29 contract. The dealer then informs you that this dispute will be reviewed by a third party – his brother-in-law – who will 30 render a decision in the matter. 31 The rationalization for the existence of political systems has, at least since the Enlightenment, depended upon the illusion of 33 a "social contract"; that governments come into existence only through the "consent of the governed" as expressed in a 34 written constitution. I know of no state system that ever originated by a contract among individuals. This is particularly true 35 in America, where the detailed history of the drafting and ratification of the Constitution illustrates the present system 36 having been coercively imposed by some upon others. If you doubt this, a reading of the history of Rhode Island will 37 provide you with one example. 38 By its very nature, a contract depends upon a voluntary commitment by two or more persons to bind themselves to a 39 clearly-expressed agreement. The common law courts have always held that agreements entered into through coercion, 40 fraud, or any other practice that does not reflect a "meeting of the minds" of individuals are wholly unenforceable. Nor have 41 the courts looked favorably upon transactions that purport to bind parties forever. If I should agree to work for you for 42 $5,000 a month and, after two years of such employment, choose to go work elsewhere, no court of law – not even in Texas 43 – would compel me to continue working for you. 44 Welcome to the study of Constitutional Law! 32

78 Adapted from A Breach of Contract , Butler Shaffer; http://lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer252.html.

Requirement for Consent

380 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________