Requirement for Consent

10.1 Introduction

1

Exclusively PRIVATE rights and PRIVATE property are beyond the civil legislative control of de jure government because 2 they are protected by the U.S.A. Constitution. 3

“The power to "legislate generally upon" life, liberty, and property, as opposed to the "power to provide modes of redress" against offensive state action, was "repugnant" to the Constitution. Id., at 15. See also United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214, 218 (1876); United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629, 639 (1883); James v. Bowman, 190 U.S. 127, 139 (1903). Although the specific holdings of these early cases might have been superseded or modified, see, e.g., Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964); United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), their treatment of Congress' §5 power as corrective or preventive, not definitional, has not

4

5

6

7

8

9

been questioned.”

10

[City of Boerne v. Florez, Archbishop of San Antonio, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)]

11

Before governments may civilly control, tax, or regulate anything they must do one or more of the following: 12

1. Convert the ownership of PRIVATE PROPERTY they want to control from EXCLUSIVELY PRIVATE to either 13 PUBLIC or QUALIFIED PRIVATE. Essentially, you are tricked into donating your PRIVATE property or a portion 14 of it to a PUBLIC use and thereby giving the public the right to CONTROL that use. 15

“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,- 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;' and to 'secure,' not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. That property [or income] which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations: First, that he shall not use it to his neighbor's injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor's benefit [e.g. SOCIAL SECURITY, Medicare, and every other public “benefit”]; second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

upon payment of due compensation .”

23

[Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892)]

24

2. Convert the CIVIL STATUS of the person engaging in the activity or owning the PRIVATE PROPERTY they want to 25 control from PRIVATE to PUBLIC. In other words, to change you: 26 2.1. From a CONSTITUTIONAL “person” to a statutory “person” and therefore public officer. A statutory person is 27 not protected by the constitution under the civil law because they have availed themselves of a “benefit” and 28 thereby waived their Constitutional rights to exchange them for “privileges” . 29

The words "privileges" and "immunities," like the greater part of the legal phraseology of this country, have been carried over from the law of Great Britain, and recur constantly either as such or in equivalent expressions from the time of Magna Charta. For all practical purposes they are synonymous in meaning, and originally signified a peculiar right or private law conceded to particular persons or places whereby a certain individual or class of individuals was exempted from the rigor of the common law [AND the constitution] . Privilege or immunity is conferred upon any person when he is invested with a legal claim to the exercise of special or peculiar rights, authorizing him to enjoy some particular advantage or exemption. See Magill v. Browne, Fed.Cas. No. 8952, 16 Fed.Cas. 408; 6 Words and Phrases, 5583, 5584; A J. Lien, “Privileges and Immunities of Citizens of the United States,” in Columbia University Studies in History, Economics, and Public

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

Law, vol. 54, p. 31.

39

[Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 19 L.Ed. 357 ]

40

2.2. From a human being to an officer of a government corporation called a “person”.

41

For proof of the above, see:

42

All Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and not Private Persons , Form #05.037 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The most important means of surreptitiously accomplishing the above conversions from PRIVATE to PUBLIC is through 43 the abuse of statutory civil franchises. Here is how the covetous conspiratorial politicians accomplish the two main goals: 44

1. Use propaganda and deceit to confuse the line between PUBLIC and PRIVATE by: 45 1.1. PRESUMING or ASSUMING that STATUTORY “persons” are the same as CONSTITUTIONAL “persons”. 46 They are NOT. This includes defining the terms “citizen” or “resident” as franchisees who are public officers 47 instead of constitutional “persons”. 48

Requirement for Consent

234 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________