Requirement for Consent

Justice , n. Title given to judges, particularly judges of U.S. and state supreme courts, and as well to judges of appellate courts. The U.S. Supreme Court, and most state supreme courts are composed of a chief justice and

1

2

several associate justices.

3

Proper administration of laws. In jurisprudence, the constant and perpetual disposition of legal matters or

4

disputes to render every man his due.

5

Commutative justice concerns obligations as between persons (e.g., in exchange of goods) and requires proportionate equality in dealings of person to person; Distributive justice concerns obligations of the community to the individual, and requires fair disbursement of common advantages and sharing of common burdens; Social justice concerns obligations of individual to community and its end is the common good.

6

7

8

9

In Feudal law, jurisdiction; judicial cognizance of causes or offenses. High justice was the jurisdiction or right of trying crimes of every kind, even the highest. This was a privilege claimed and exercised by the great lords

10

11

or barons of the middle ages. Law justice was jurisdiction of petty offenses.

12

See also Miscarriage of justice; Obstructing justice. [ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 864]

13

14

Apparently, only pastors can be trusted to tell the truth about the meaning of “justice”, because Pharisees/lawyers with 15 Mercedes payments to make aren’t going to undermine their livelihood and make their job moot by telling the truth. 16 Common to both the ecclesiastical and the legal dictionary definitions of “justice” above, however, is the notion of 17 “rendering to every man his due”. The world owes NOTHING to any man. As the Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302 says at 18 the beginning of section 4.1: 19

“Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first. ”

20

[Mark Twain]

21

The only thing that can be “owed” or “due” to a man is that which he has earned or procured under contract to some other 22 free agent. What is owed to him is considered “property”, and the government’s most fundamental obligation is to protect 23 our right to property. Therefore, the whole notion of “justice” originates from the exercise of our right to contract. All law, 24 in fact, is an extension of our right to contract, as we said in the previous sections, because it is created with our consent, 25 behaves as a contract, and conveys to us certain rights and benefits that courts have a sacred duty to protect. Even the U.S. 26 Supreme Court recognized this fact, when it said: 27

" Independent of these views, there are many considerations which lead to the conclusion that the power to impair contracts [either the Constitution or the Holy Bible], by direct action to that end, does not exist with the general [federal] government. In the first place, one of the objects of the Constitution, expressed in its preamble, was the establishment of justice, and what that meant in its relations to contracts is not left, as was justly said by the late Chief Justice, in Hepburn v. Griswold, to inference or conjecture. As he observes, at the time the Constitution was undergoing discussion in the convention, the Congress of the Confederation was engaged in framing the ordinance for the government of the Northwestern Territory, in which certain articles of compact were established between the people of the original States and the people of the Territory, for the purpose, as expressed in the instrument, of extending the fundamental principles of civil and religious liberty, upon which the States, their laws and constitutions, were erected. By that ordinance it was declared, that, in the just preservation of rights and property, 'no law ought ever to be made, or have force in the said Territory, that shall, in any manner, interfere with or affect private contracts or engagements bona fide and without fraud previously formed. ' The same provision, adds the Chief Justice, found more condensed expression in the prohibition upon the States [in Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution] against impairing the obligation of contracts, which has ever been recognized as an efficient safeguard against injustice; and though the prohibition is not applied in terms to the government of the United States, he expressed the opinion, speaking for himself and the majority of the court at the time, that it was clear 'that those who framed and those who adopted the Constitution intended that the spirit of this prohibition should pervade the entire body of legislation, and that the justice which the Constitution was ordained to establish was not thought by them to be compatible with legislation [or judicial precedent] of an opposite tendency. ' 8 Wall. 623. [99 U.S. 700,

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

765] Similar views are found expressed in the opinions of other judges of this court."

48

[Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878)]

49

The reason the U.S. Supreme Court had to state the above is that if it did not, it would be sanctioning public servants to 50 violate the right to contract of We the People, by disrespecting the Constitution itself, which is a contract. The U.S. 51 Supreme Court also recognized that state Constitutions are “contracts” as well, when it said: 52

" A state can no more impair the obligation of a contract by her organic law [constitution] than by legislative enactment; for her constitution is a law within the meaning of the contract clause of the national constitution. Railroad Co. v. [115 U.S. 650, 673] McClure, 10 Wall. 511; Ohio Life Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt,

53

54

55

Requirement for Consent

216 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________