Requirement for Consent

First page Table of contents Previous page 215 Next page Last page

6.2. They will remove references to “nontaxpayers” off their website. 1 6.3. When asked about whether the “code” is voluntary, they will lie to you and tell you that it isn’t. 2 6.4. They will pretend like a “private law” is a “public law”. 3 6.5. They will ensure that all paperwork, such as the W-4, in which you consent hides the fact that it is a contract or 4 agreement. Look at the W-4 form: Do you see any reference to the word “agreement” on it? Well guess what, 5 it’s an agreement and you didn’t even know. The regulations at 26 C.F.R. §31.3401(a)-3(a) say it’s an 6 “agreement”, which is a contract. Why didn’t your public SERVANTS tell you this? Because they want to fool 7 you into thinking that participation is mandatory and that the Internal Revenue Code is a “public law”, when in 8 fact, it is a “private law” that you must consent to in order to be subject to. 9 On a few very rare occasions, some people have gotten employees of the IRS to admit some of the above facts. Below is a 10 link to a remarkable letter signed by an IRS Disclosure Officer, Cynthia Mills, which admits that the Internal Revenue 11 Code is “special law” and is essentially voluntary and avoidable: 12 The important thing to remember is that statutes that are not positive law are not legal evidence of an obligation, but simply 13 “prima facie evidence”, meaning that they are a presumption. It is a violation of due process of law to deny rights protected 14 by the constitution based on a presumption. Hence, that which is not positive law: 15 1. Cannot possibly have the “force of law” against you absent your consent. 16 2. Cannot be transformed by any judge into legal evidence of an obligation without violating due process of law. 17 3. Acquires the “force of law” by you quoting or using its provisions, which implies that you are accepting what the 18 courts call “the benefits and protections of the law”. In other words, you consent receive the “benefits” or “privileges” 19 of the franchise and hence are automatically subject to its provisions. 20 SEDM Exhibit #09.023 http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm

CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS PART 2. CONTRACTS CHAPTER 3. CONSENT

Section 1589

25 26

1589. A voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a transaction is equivalent to a consent to all the obligations

arising from it, so far as the facts are known, or ought to be known, to the person accepting.

9.10.4

Justice in the context of franchises and your right to contract

The whole notion of “justice” implies the requirement of positive law in all dealings with the public. The only way that 30 positive law can be enacted is through the consent of those it is enforced against, which the Declaration of Independence 31 calls “the consent of the governed”. Below is a definition of “justice” from Easton’s Bible Dictionary which clearly proves 32 this: 33

J USTICE — is rendering to everyone [equally, whether citizen or alien] that which is his due. It has been distinguished from equity in this respect, that while justice means merely the doing [of] what positive law

demands , equity means the doing of what is fair and right in every separate case. 43

[Easton’s Bible Dictionary, 1996]

We would also add to the above definition that:

Enforcing anything BUT “positive law”.

2. Enforcing anything unequally against one group or class of persons more than another. 40 3. Taking more tax as a percentage from one group than another. 41

. . .equates with INjustice or the OPPOSITE of justice, in our view. When we look up the definition of “justice” in the legal 42 dictionary, however, lawyers try to hide its relationship to “positive law”. Below is the definition of “justice” from Black’s 43 Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition: 44

43 Easton, M. 1996, c1897. Easton's Bible dictionary . Logos Research Systems, Inc.: Oak Harbor, WA

Requirement for Consent

215 of 396

EXHIBIT:________

Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online