Requirement for Consent

8.1. A statutory “non -resident non- person” if no engaged in a public office. 1 8.2. A statutory “nonresident alien” (per 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B)) if engaged in a public office. In this case, the 2 OFFICE is the legal “person” that has a domicile on federal territory while the OFFICER filling said office has 3 legislatively foreign domicile. 4 9. Those who are neither domiciled on federal territory nor representing an entity domiciled there are not subject to 5 federal statutory civil law or income taxation as confirmed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b). These people are 6 called any of the following in relation to the federal/national government: 7 9.1. Statutory “non -resident non- persons” 8 9.2. “nonresidents”. 9 9.3. “transient foreigners”. 10 9.4. “sojourners”. 11 9.5. “ stateless persons ” in relation to federal jurisdiction. 12 10. The government cannot lawfully coerce you to choose a domicile in a place. A government that coerced you into 13 choosing a domicile in their jurisdiction is engaging in a “protection racket”, which is highly illegal. A coerced 14 domicile it is not a domicile of your choice and therefore lawfully confers no jurisdiction or rights upon the 15 government: 16

" Similarly, when a person is prevented from leaving his domicile by circumstances not of his doing and beyond his control, he may be relieved of the consequences attendant on domicile at that place . In Roboz (USDC D.C. 1963) [Roboz v. Kennedy, 219 F.Supp. 892 (D.D.C. 1963), p. 24], a federal statute was involved which precluded the return of an alien's property if he was found to be domiciled in Hungary prior to a certain date. It was found that Hungary was Nazi-controlled at the time in question and that the persons involved would have left Hungary (and lost domicile there) had they been able to. Since they had been precluded from leaving because of the political privations imposed by the very government they wanted to escape (the father was in prison there), the court would not hold them to have lost their property based on a domicile that

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

circumstances beyond their control forced them to retain."

25

[Conflicts in a Nutshell, David D. Siegel and Patrick J. Borchers, West Publishing, p. 24]

26

11. Domicile is a method of lawfully delegating authority to a “sovereign” to protect you. That delegation of authority 27 causes you to voluntarily surrender some of your rights to the government in exchange for “protection”. That 28 protection comes from the civil and criminal laws that the sovereign passes, because the purpose of all government and 29 all law is “protection”. The U.S. Supreme Court calls this delegation of authority “allegiance”. To wit: 30

“Allegiance and protection [by the government from harm] are, in this connection, reciprocal obligations. The one is a compensation for the other; allegiance for protection and protection for allegiance. ”

31

32

[Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 166-168 (1874)]

33

12. All allegiance must be voluntary, which is why only consenting adults past the age of majority can have a legal 34 domicile. The following facts confirm this conclusion: 35 12.1. Minors cannot choose a domicile, but by law assume the domicile of their parents. 36 12.2. Incompetent or insane persons assume the domicile of their caregivers. 37 13. It is perfectly lawful to have a domicile in a place OTHER than the place you currently live. Those who find 38 themselves in this condition are called “transient foreigners”, and the only laws they are subject to are the criminal laws 39 in the place they are at. 40

"Transient foreigner. One who visits the country, without the intention of remaining."

41

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1498]

42

14. There are many complicated rules of “presumption” about how to determine the domicile of an individual: 43 14.1. You can read these rules on the web at: 44 28 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Domicile (2003) http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/Domicile-28CJS-20051203.pdf 14.2. The reason that the above publication about domicile is so complicated and long, is that its main purpose is to 45 disguise the voluntary , consensual nature of domicile or remove it entirely from the decisions of courts and 46 governments so that simply being present on the king’s land makes one into a “subject” of the king. This is not 47 how a republican form of government works and we don’t have a monarchy in this country that would allow this 48 abusive approach to law to function. 49

“Yet, it is to be remembered, and that whether in its real origin, or in its artificial state, allegiance, as well as fealty, rests upon lands, and it is due to persons. Not so, with respect to Citizenship, which has arisen from the dissolution of the feudal system and is a substitute for allegiance, corresponding with the new order of things.

50

51

52

Requirement for Consent

167 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________