Requirement for Consent

2.1. A specific action evidencing consent under the terms of the transaction proposed. 1 2.2. Inaction or silence when enforcement of the thing proposed is attempted against the person against whom it was 2 proposed. 3

For example, consider a stick up. Someone approaches you in a dark alley with a gun, and says: 4

“This be a fuckin ’ stickup. Gimme everything in your wallet or I’m gonna shoot you .”

5

You hand them the wallet and they walk away with it. Has there been a concurrence of wills? You agreed because you 6 handed them the wallet, and that action might be construed as evidence of “ implied consent ” described above. However, 7 you were under duress and were in fear. As we proved earlier, anything done in the presence of such fear or terror cannot 8 truthfully be characterized as a “ meeting of the minds ” . 9

“As used in the law of rape ‘consent’ means consent of the will, and submission under the influence of fear or terror cannot amount to real consent. There must be an exercise of intelligence based on knowledge of its significance and moral quality and there must be a [free, uncoerced] choice between resistance and assent. And if a woman resists to the point where further resistance would be useless or until

10

11

12

13

14

her resistance is overcome by force or violence, submission thereafter is not ‘consent’.”

15

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 305, emphasis added]

16

Why is there no meeting of the minds? Because:

17

1. You didn’t WILL or wish that the transaction should happen. 18 2. As soon as the criminal leaves the scene, you are going to call the police and have him arrested for a crime. A crime, 19 after all, is anything done to you that injures you and which was accomplished without your consent. 20 Here is yet one more example that helps illustrate the difference between “consent” and “agreement” . If you fill out a 21 government form that proposes a commercial transaction with the government and connects the applicant to a federal 22 “benefit” or franchise, but: 23 1. You are compelled under duress by some third party bank or financial institution to fill out and submit a government 24 form such as a tax withholding form. The duress originates from the fact that the form is submitted under penalty of 25 perjury, and the company demanding it threatens to either not hire you, to fire you, or to not do business 26 (DISCRIMINATE under the color of law, no less) if you don’t fill out a SPECIFIC form and put a SPECIFIC thing on 27 the form. Hence, they are instituting the crime of tampering with a federal witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1512, as 28 well as conspiracy to commit perjury, perjury, and subornation of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§1001, 1542, and 29 1621. 30 2. You know that the form is the WRONG form and that filling it out will constitute fraud and perjury. 31 3. You write on the form or on an attachment to it that you were under duress to fill it out and that it is FALSE, and that 32 the institutor of the duress is the responsible party for why it is false, because they are actively interfering with filling it 33 out with correct information or with using a DIFFERENT and MORE CORRECT form that accurately describes your 34 status. 35 4. In self-defense, you attach to the compelled form a list of definitions for what the words on the form mean, all of which 36 are the complete opposite of those found in the Internal Revenue Code and which place you, your property, and your 37 domicile outside of the statutory but not constitutional “United States” and outside of federal jurisdiction. 38 5. You submit a criminal complaint to the requesting that the IRS prosecute the institutor of the duress for conspiracy to 39 defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §287, impersonating a public officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §912. 40 6. The IRS deliberately engages in “selective enforcement ” by refusing to prosecute the institutor of the duress so that 41 they can fill their pockets with STOLEN plunder. 42 . . .Then could the withholding forms you submit be counted as an “agreement”? For instance, 26 C.F.R. §31.3401(a)-3(a) 43 and 26 C.F.R. §31.3402(p) identify the IRS Form W-4 as an “agreement”, but if you know you are not the statutory federal 44 “employee” described in the upper left corner of the form and also in 26 U.S.C. §3401(d) and 5 U.S.C. §2105, isn’t the 45 agreement the product of “error” and thus, the consent VOID based on the above analysis? Therefore, all alleged “taxes” 46 resulting from the coerced exchange in fact are THEFT and not “taxes” as legally defined? Isn’t the only difference 47 between theft and a “donation” the consent of the original owner? Incidentally a form that you can use to attach to tax 48

Requirement for Consent

109 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________