Advancing the Kingdom of Yeshua law lesson 2

these trusts. This means the average attorney is clueless about these trusts and is therefore afraid of them. They are afraid of the unknown. Most Bar licensed attorneys will thus warn against them, and will usually cite inapplicable laws in an effort to dissuade people from using them. They often cite cases where they claim courts have dishonored such trusts. Any so-called “pure” or “common law” trust which has ever been “dishonored” in such a case was most definitely not the kind we are talking about herein. The kind we are talking about herein has never been invalidated, and in fact, cannot be invalidated. Therefore it is advisable to steer clear of Bar licensed attorneys in general, and avoid their counsel on this subject. It is better to connect with the true experts, who may or may not have a Bar license. The true experts are those who, like the counsel that advise the elite, have been quietly operating these trusts for generations and have had no problem with them. There are various adjectives that describe aspects of this trust. Some are: Pure. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, a “pure” trust is: “A trust situation that involves three parties. The parties are the creator of the trust, the trustee, and the beneficiary. This is a contractual trust and is different from a statutory trust and is a legal document.” Irrevocable. Suppose you have a million dollars, and someone wants to get it from you. Suppose they were able to file a court case against you and win a judgment against you for a million dollars. Then the court could force you to give it to the winning party. Now suppose you had put the million dollars into a revocable trust. That means you could revoke the transfer at any time. If the court orders you to pay the million dollars, you might say you don’t have it, because it is in the trust. But if the trust is revocable, the court could order you to revoke the transfer – thus retrieving the money back from the trust. In that case too, you will have lost, because you could still be forced to pay. But if the trust were irrevocable, then that means even if you order the trust to give the money back to you, it has no obligation to do so. The trustee could say that it is irrevocable, and it can refuse to return the money. Then even the court cannot force you to pay the million dollars. You truly have it no more. And the court cannot order the trust to pay it, because the trust is not you – the trust is a legal separate entity. If the trustee has a private arrangement with you whereby, he allows the trust funds to take care of your expenses or fulfills your wishes to distribute monies to various parties, then you can still benefit from the trust. . . but the court has no power to force the trust to honor the judgment against you personally. That is called “bullet proof asset protection”. What is a Natural Law Trust?

www.kflcc.org | © All Rights Reserved KFLCC