Requirement for Consent

“selective enforcement” to benefit itself personally and financially and has a criminal conflict of financial interest. Here is 1 how the U.S. Supreme Court describes such a de facto government: 2

"It must be conceded that there are [PRIVATE] rights [and property] in every free government beyond the control of the State [or any judge or jury]. A government which recognized no such rights, which held the lives, liberty and property of its citizens, subject at all times to the disposition and unlimited control of even the most democratic depository of power, is after all a despotism. It is true that it is a despotism of the many--

3

4

5

6

of the majority, if you choose to call it so--but it is not the less a despotism."

7

[Loan Assoc. v. Topeka, 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) 655 , 665 (1874)]

8

The de facto government described above that REFUSES to do the MAIN job it was created to do of protecting PRIVATE 9 rights is extensively described in: 10

De Facto Government Scam , Form #05.043 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The Declaration of Independence says that all just powers of government derive from the “consent” of the governed, which 11 implies that anything not consensual is unjust. “Consent” is the real issue, not “free will”. When a government lawyer is 12 prosecuting a rape perpetrator, he doesn’t talk about whether the woman “volunteered” to have sex by failing to fight her 13 attacker. Instead, he talks about whether she “consented”. 14

“As used in the law of rape ‘consent’ means consent of the will, and submission under the influence of fear or terror cannot amount to real consent. There must be an exercise of intelligence based on knowledge of its significance and moral quality and there must be a [free, uncoerced] choice between resistance and assent. And if a woman resists to the point where further resistance would be useless or until

15

16

17

18

19

her resistance is overcome by force or violence, submission thereafter is not ‘consent’.”

20

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 305, emphasis added]

21

Somehow, these same federal prosecutors, when THEY become the “financial rapists” of the citizenry, suddenly magically 22 and mysteriously “forget” about the requirement for the same kind of “consent” in the context of taxes on the labor of a 23 human being. Like the all too frequent political scandals that haunt American politics, they develop “selective amnesia” 24 about the fact that slavery and involuntary servitude were outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment, and that taxes on labor 25 are slavery. For no explicable or apparent reason that they are willing to admit, they mysteriously replace the forbidden 26 “consent” word with a nebulous “voluntary compliance” so there is just enough “cognitive dissonance” to keep the jury in 27 fear and doubt so they can be easily manipulated to do the government’s illegal lynching of a fellow citizen. Who better 28 than a lawyer would use language to disguise the criminal nature of their acts? Apparently, financial rape is OK as long as 29 the government is doing the raping and as long as government lawyers are careful to use “politically correct” words to 30 describe the rape like “voluntary compliance”. Do women being raped “voluntarily comply” with their rapists at the point 31 they quit fighting? We think not, and the same thing could be said of those who do not wish to participate in a corrupted 32 and unconstitutionally administered tax system under protest. 33 In a free country such as we have in America, consent is mandatory in every human interaction. The basis for protecting 34 rights within such an environment is the free exercise of our power to contract. All law in a society populated by 35 Sovereigns is based on our right to contract. If we are entering into a consensual relationship with another party where risk 36 may be involved, we can write a contract or agreement to define the benefits and liabilities resulting from that relationship 37 and use the court system to ensure adherence to the contract. 38

Contract . An agreement between two or more [sovereign] persons which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. As defined in Restatement, Second, Contracts §3: “A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.” A legal relationships consisting of the rights and duties of the contracting parties; a promise or set of promises constituting an agreement between the parties that gives each a legal duty to the other and also the right to seek a remedy for the breach of those duties. Its essentials are competent parties, subject matter, a legal consideration, mutuality of agreement, and mutuality of consideration. Lamoureaux v.

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

Burrillville Racing Ass’n, 91 R.I. 94, 161 A.2d. 213, 215.

46

Under U.C.C., term refers to total legal obligation which results from parties’ agreement as affected by the Code. Section 1-201(11). As to sales, “contract” and “agreement” are limited to those relating to present or

47

48

Requirement for Consent

93 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________