Requirement for Consent

http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

1

3.2. Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons , Form #05.037

2

http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

3

4. Judges essentially by fiat write the “definitions” by adding to statutes and case law through presumption and violation 4 of the Rules of Statutory Construction and Interpretation. On the other hand, judges CANNOT violate these rules if 5 statutes are not invoked to determine “what is due”. See: 6 Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud , Form #05.014 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 5. Judges are financially “ incentivized ” to use the statutory PUBLIC definitions and thereby ENFRANCHISE you and 7 the administration of justice in order to increase their importance, pay, and government revenues. 3 It makes them into 8 lords over their own franchise “fiefdom”: 9

“ franchise court. Hist. A privately held court that (usu.) exists by virtue of a royal grant [privilege], with jurisdiction over a variety of matters, depending on the grant and whatever powers the court acquires over time. In 1274, Edward I abolished many of these feudal courts by forcing the nobility to demonstrate by what authority (quo warranto) they held court. If a lord could not produce a charter reflecting the franchise, the

10

11

12

13

court was abolished. - Also termed courts of the franchise.

14

Dispensing justice was profitable. Much revenue could come from the fees and dues, fines and amercements. This explains the growth of the second class of feudal courts, the Franchise Courts. They too were private courts held by feudal lords. Sometimes their claim to jurisdiction was based on old pre-Conquest grants ... But many of them were, in reality, only wrongful usurpations of private jurisdiction by powerful lords. These were put down after the famous Quo Warranto enquiry in the reign of Edward 1." W.J.V. Windeyer, Lectures on

15

16

17

18

19

Legal History 56-57 (2d ed. 1949) .”

20

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, p. 668]

21

6. The definition judges INVENT by illegal means and fiat invites you to use the civil STATUTORY definitions of what 22 is “due” if you or they don’t like the common law definitions. This then invites you to become a public officer and 23 therefore “subject” of the government who is INFERIOR. That public officer is called a civil statutory “citizen”, 24 “resident”, “person”, or “taxpayer” , etc. 25 The reason that so many legal reference sources try to confuse the definition of “justice” and replace “the right to be left 26 alone” with the phrase “give every man his due” is to try to turn justice into a franchise and “benefit” that they can charge 27 for and which you then have an obligation to PAY directly and personally for. That payment usually is demanded through 28 income (franchise) taxes: 29

“Hominum caus jus constitutum est. Law is established for the benefit of man.”

30

[Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856; SOURCE:

31

http://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htm]

32

Franchises are covered in:

33

Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises , Form #05.030 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

This type of abuse by judges in collusion with legislators is a perversion of the original meaning of the word so that 34 “justice” can be turned into a profitable franchise and the courts can be turned into a place of business, like the money 35 changers who Jesus got angry at. 36

"To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay right or justice."

37

[Magna Carta, ch. 40 (1215)]

38

“Woe to you, scribes [religious leaders] and Pharisees [lawyers], hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin [to the false god of government with your attorney licenses and your 501(c)(3) and "privileged" tax exemptions, neither of which any positive law requires], and have neglected the weightier [most important] matters of the law [God's Law]: justice and mercy and faith [in God, and Truth]. These you

39

40

41

42

ought to have done, without leaving the others undone .”

43

[Jesus (God) in Matt. 23:23, Bible, NKJV]

44

3 Watch the following video for proof, right from Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia:

SEDM Exhibit 11.006;

http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm.

Requirement for Consent

74 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________