Requirement for Consent
Court has declared this to be a fundamental principle of the constitution; and so we shall consider it in deciding
1
on the present motion. 2 Peters, 590, 91.
2
Those states, in their highest sovereign capacity, in the convention of the people thereof; on whom, by the revolution, the prerogative of the crown, and the transcendant power of parliament devolved, in a plenitude unimpaired by any act, and controllable by no authority, 6 Wheat. 651; 8 Wheat. 584, 88; adopted the constitution, by which they respectively made to the United States a grant of judicial power over controversies between two or more states. By the constitution, it was ordained that this judicial power, in cases where a state was a party, should be exercised by this Court as one of original jurisdiction. The states waived their exemption from judicial power, 6 Wheat. 378, 80 , as sovereigns by original and inherent right, by their own grant of its exercise over themselves in such cases, but which they would not grant to any inferior tribunal. By this grant, this Court has acquired jurisdiction over the parties in this cause, by their own consent and delegated authority; as their agent for executing the judicial power of the United States in the cases specified. [The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants v. the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Defendant, 37 U.S. 657, 12 Pet. 657, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838)]
14
The same distinctions apply to the PEOPLE within those states in relation to their own state government and even the 15 national government, at least from a CIVIL statutory perspective. 16
“The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” [N.Y. v. re Merriam 36 N.E.
17
505; 141 N.Y. 479; affirmed 16 S.Ct. 1073; 41 L. Ed. 287] [underlines added] [19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §884 (2003)]
18
19
Why is the national government a “foreign corporation” in respect to a CONSTITUTIONAL state? Because their first and 20 MAIN job is to leave you alone , which means treat you as “foreign”, “stateless”, a “nonresident”, and a “stranger” unless 21 and until you SPECIFICALLY CONSENT, demand, and ask to be civilly protected by selecting a civil domicile. As we 22 have just proven, you are an IDIOT and an idolater of you ask Caesar to do this, according to God. 23
" Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society . It ever has been, and ever will be pursued, until
24
it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit." [James Madison, The Federalist No. 51 (1788)]
25
26
______________________________________________________________________________________
27
PAULSEN, ETHICS (Thilly's translation), chap. 9.
28
“ Justice, as a moral habit, is that tendency of the will and mode of conduct which refrains from disturbing the lives and interests of others, and, as far as possible, hinders such interference on the part of others. This virtue springs from the individual's respect for his fellows as ends in themselves and as his co equals. The different spheres of interests may be roughly classified as follows: body and life; the family, or the extended individual life; property, or the totality of the instruments of action; honor, or the ideal existence; and finally freedom, or the possibility of fashioning one's life as an end in itself. The law defends these different spheres, thus giving rise to a corresponding number of spheres of rights, each being protected by a prohibition. . . . To violate the rights, to interfere with the interests of others, is injustice. All injustice is ultimately directed against the life of the neighbor; it is an open avowal that the latter is not an end in itself, having the same value as the individual's own life. The general formula of the duty of justice may therefore be stated as follows: Do no wrong yourself, and permit no wrong to be done, so far as lies in your power; or, expressed positively: Respect and
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
protect the right.”
40
[Readings on the History and System of the Common Law, Second Edition, Roscoe Pound, 1925, p. 2]
41
"The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone - the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by
42
43
44
45
46
civilized men. "
47
[Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting); see also Washington v.
48
Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)]
49
“Do not strive with [or try to regulate or control or enslave] a man without cause, if he has done you no
50
harm .”
51
[Prov. 3:30, Bible, NKJV]
52
"With all [our] blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow citizens-- a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not
53
54
55
Requirement for Consent
59 of 396
Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013
EXHIBIT:________
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online