Requirement for Consent

(5) A party that has made a waiver affecting an executory portion of a contract may retract the waiver by reasonable notification received by the other party that strict performance will be required of any term waived, unless the retraction would be unjust in view of a material change of position in reliance on the waiver.

1

2

3

The following two videos insightfully illustrate how the above two principles can be used to defeat an offer of a franchise 4 by the government and make YOU the Merchant and THEM the Buyer, rather than the other way around. In effect, you are 5 using their own secret weapon against them and turning the tables. Under the concept of equal protection and equal 6 treatment, they HAVE to let you do this and if they deny you the ability, indirectly they have to deny THEMSELVES the 7 ability as well!: 8

1.

This Form is Your Form, Mark DeAngelis http://www.youtube.com/embed/b6-PRwhU7cg

9

10

2.

Mirror Image Rule, Mark DeAngelis

11

http://www.youtube.com/embed/j8pgbZV757w

12

Those seeking to undermine compelled participation in government franchises should consider the following tactics: 13

1. Attaching a MANDATORY attachment to the application indicating the duress and saying the applicant does NOT 14 consent to receive any “benefit”. 15 2. Defining all terms on the form to completely exclude any government jurisdiction over them. 16 3. Identifying the application NOT as an ACCEPTANCE of any kind, but a counter offer that makes the 17 GOVERNMENT the recipient of the “benefit” of the temporary use of YOUR property and labor and thereby subject 18 to YOUR anti-franchise franchise. 19

We use the above tactics throughout our ministry in the following forms: 20

1. Tax Form Attachment , Form #04.201 – turns the government’s offer of the “trade or business” franchise into a 21 COUNTER-OFFER and you into the Merchant instead of them. Proposes a an anti-franchise franchise that obligates 22 the GOVERNMENT and not YOU. Signifies that a failure to deny constitutes acceptance of the offer. 23 2. Socialism: The New American Civil Religion , Form #05.016, Section 13-describes how to defeat word games intended 24 to unknowingly recruit you into a franchise status. 25 3. Injury Defense Franchise and Agreement , Form #06.027- provides a SUBSTITUTE franchise you can cite and use in 26 your counter-offer as a Merchant rather than a Buyer. 27 The only defense the de facto government has against the above tactics is sovereign immunity, but the agreement turns 28 anyone receiving the “benefits” into YOUR public officer instead of an officer of the de facto government, so that defense 29 can’t and doesn’t work. 30 Socialism is state worship and idolatry from a religious perspective. It places civil rulers and/or government above the 32 average man and imputes supernatural powers to them that ordinary men do not have. THAT is the ONLY lawful 33 technique by which they can “govern” you. From a legal perspective, state worship can only be maintained when equal 34 protection and equal treatment can be replaced with inequality and hypocrisy. This inequality is manufactured using the 35 following means within the legal field: 36 1. Using franchises to make the applicants subservient to the grantor of the franchises. In legal terms, the grantor is 37 referred to as a “parens patriae”. 38 2. Confusing STATUTORY and CONSTITUTIONAL contexts for words. They will try to make you believe that BOTH 39 contexts are the same, even though they are NOT. The difference between STATUTORY and CONSTITUTIONAL 40 contexts is described in: 41 Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen , Form #05.006, Sections 3 and 4 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 3. Confusing the LEGAL and ORDINARY meaning of words. This is done using “words of art”. They will use the 42 words in the ORDINARY sense when speaking to the jury and on government forms, but when actually ENFORCING 43 the implications of the forms, they will interpret them in their LEGAL sense. See: 44 11.2.5 Using definitions to destroy or replace the government’s offer 31

Requirement for Consent

377 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________