Requirement for Consent

6.2. It is illegal for you to unilaterally “elect” yourself into public office by filling out any government form. For 1 instance, you can’t lawfully use tax forms to unilaterally “elect” yourself into public office. The public office or 2 “trade or business” associated with the activity being regulated and taxed must be lawfully created BEFORE you 3 became a “statutory “taxpayer”. 4 7. The words associated with the status such as “taxpayer” (under the Income Tax franchise), “driver” (under the Vehicle 5 Code franchise), “spouse” (under the Family Code franchise) are defined on all forms you submitted to NOT be 6 associated with the status that the public rights or franchise rights attach to. The following form on our website defines 7 all terms used on any government form submitted to third parties as EXCLUDING the meanings appearing in any 8 federal law: 9 8. The franchise contract/agreement cannot be enforced extraterritorially against those not domiciled on federal territory, 10 such as people within constitutional states of the Union. 11 9. The franchise is unenforceable as a contract BECAUSE it provides nothing that you define as a “benefit”. 12 10. The laws regulating officers of the court FORBID them from making determinations about your status in the context of 13 the proceeding that might associate you with obligations under the franchise contract. For instance, the Declaratory 14 Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §2201(a) prohibits federal judges from declaring or determining whether you are a statutory 15 “taxpayer”. 16 Tax Form Attachment , Form #04.201 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

Specifically, Rowen seeks a declaratory judgment against the United States of America with respect to "whether or not the plaintiff is a taxpayer pursuant to, and/or under 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(14)." (See Compl. at 2.) This Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment "with respect to Federal taxes other than actions brought under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986," a code section that is not at issue in the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. §2201; see also Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d. 531, 536-537 (9th Cir. 1991) (affirming dismissal of claim for declaratory relief under § 2201 where claim concerned question of tax liability). Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and the instant action is hereby

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

DISMISSED.

24

[Rowen v. U.S., 05-3766MMC. (N.D.Cal. 11/02/2005) ]

25

11.1.2

How to skip out of “government church worship services”

26

It ought to be clear by now that government is simply another type of church and religion. We call it a “civil religion” and 27 we have written an entire book to describe this religion: 28

Socialism: The New American Civil Religion , Form #05.016 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

Those who don’t want to join the church simply change their domicile to be outside the state-sponsored church: 29

Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent , Form #05.002 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

Those who are not part of the church but who appear before the priests of the church, who are the judges in the 30 government’s courts, are presumed to consent to their jurisdiction if they make an “appearance” before a judge: 31

appearance . A coming into court as a party to a suit, either in person or by attorney, whether as plaintiff or defendant. The formal proceeding by which a defendant submits himself to the jurisdiction of the court. The

32

33

voluntary submission to a court's jurisdiction.

34

In civil actions the parties do not normally actually appear in person, but rather through their attorneys (who enter their appearance by filing written pleadings, or a formal written entry of appearance). Also, at many stages of criminal proceedings, particularly involving minor offenses, the defendant's attorney appears on his

35

36

37

behalf. See e.g., Fed.R.Crim.P. 43.

38

An appearance may be either general or special ; the former is a simple and unqualified or unrestricted submission to the jurisdiction of the court, the latter is a submission to the jurisdiction for some specific purpose only, not for all the purposes of the suit. A special appearance is for the purpose of testing or objecting to the sufficiency of service or the jurisdiction of the court over defendant without submitting to such jurisdiction; a general appearance is made where the defendant waives defects of service and submits to the jurisdiction of court. Insurance Co. of North America v. Kunin, 175 Neb. 260, 121 N.W.2d. 372, 375, 376.

39

40

41

42

43

44

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 97]

45

Requirement for Consent

361 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________