Requirement for Consent

11. “wages”

1

12. “individual”

2

The only way to overcome false presumptions about the meaning of the above words is to read the codes and laws for 3 oneself, which the IRS knows that few Americans will do. This constructive fraud counts on the following elements to be 4 successful: 5 1. A deficient public education system run by the government which dumbs-down Americans by not teaching them either 6 “law” or “constitutional law”, in any grammar, junior high, or high school curricula. 7 2. College and university curricula in government-run universities that do not require the study of any aspect of law for 8 most majors. 9 3. IRS and government websites that do not define the meaning of these words. See section 3.12.1 of the Great IRS 10 Hoax , Form #11.302 and following for examples. 11 4. IRS publications that deliberately do not define the meaning of these words. 12 5. Legal dictionaries that have had these critical words removed so that they cannot be easily understood. For instance, 13 no legal dictionary published at this time that we could find has a definition of the term “United States” in it. See 14 section 6.10.1 of the Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302, for instance. 15 6. Federal courts that have become vehicles for political propaganda and terrorism rather than justice. See sections 2.8.13 16 through 2.8.13.8.1 of the Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302, Sections 2.8.13 through 2.8.13.8.1. 17 7. A refusal, upon submitting a Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Request, to provide an unambiguous and honest 18 definition of these words that includes the WHOLE truth. 19 Those who try to educate the public about the legal meaning of the above words have been persecuted by the IRS, and this 20 includes us. If you would like to learn more about this fraud, consult the following sections of the Great IRS Hoax , Form 21 #11.302: 22

 

Subsections underneath section 3.12.1. Section 5.9 later about vague laws

23

24

10.8.2

Ignoring Responsive Correspondence to Collection Notices

25

When the IRS attempts illegal collection actions against Americans, they send out threatening correspondence, often via 26 certified mail. Many recipients respond faithfully to this correspondence, using research from this book, documenting that 27 the IRS is: 28

1.

Violating enacted positive law.

29

2. Wrongfully enforcing against a “nontaxpayer”. 3. Involved in racketeering and organized extortion.

30

31

4.

Collecting without the consent of the target.

32

We call such responses to illegal enforcement actions “response letters”. Any time a person sends a response letter to the 33 IRS, they are doing what is called “Petitioning their government for illegal and unconstitutional abuses.” The First 34 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution makes petitioning the government a protected right, the exercise of which cannot be 35 penalized. Such a petition also requires an earnest response by the IRS and due respect for the legal issues raised in it. 36 Seldom are these response letters read or even responded to by the IRS. Instead, the IRS routinely penalizes those 37 submitting such correspondence by: 38 1. Instituting penalties illegally and in violation of the Constitutional prohibition against Bills of Attainder. A Bill of 39 Attainder is a penalty without a court trial, and it is prohibited by Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution against 40 natural persons. 41 2. Creating additional retaliatory assessments. 42 3. Falsifying the Individual Master File (I.M.F.) of the respondent by indicating that they are involved in criminal 43 activity. When the respondent notices this in their record, then the IRS refuses to correct the computer fraud, which is 44 actually a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1030. See our Master File (MF) Decoder for how this fraud works: 45 Master File (MF) Decoder, SEDM http://sedm.org/ItemInfo/Programs/MFDecoder/MFDecoder.htm

Requirement for Consent

355 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________