Requirement for Consent

them for honest answers, they would probably tell you that their supervisor threatened them if they leaked out what is 1 meant by “United States” to callers or if they put anything in writing. They are obviously holding the truth hostage for 2 20 pieces of silver. They will positively refuse to give you anything in writing that will help clarify the meaning of 3 “United States” as used in the pamphlet, because they want to make it very risky and confrontational for you to keep 4 your hard-earned money. They will refuse to take any responsibility whatsoever to help you follow the law, and they 5 will conveniently claim ignorance of the law, even though ignorance of the law is no excuse, according the courts. 6

Note in the above the hypocrisy evident in the situation and the resulting violation of equal protection of the laws mandated 7 by the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: 8

1. You are being compelled to take a risk of spending five years in jail by signing something under penalty of perjury that 9 they can falsely accuse you is fraudulent and wrong. All you have to do is look at them the wrong way and they will 10 try to sick a mafia police state on you. At the same time, there is absolutely no one in government who is or can be 11 required to take the equivalent risk by signing a determination about the meaning of “United States” in their own 12 misleading publication. 13 2. TSP Publication OC-96-21 starts off with a disclaimer of liability and advice to consult an attorney, and yet it is 14 impossible for you to have the same kind of disclaimer if you sign their form at the end of the pamphlet. 15 3. They refuse to put anything in writing that they say or do and require EVERYTHING you do with them to be in 16 writing and signed under penalty of perjury. If you do a Privacy Act request for their internal documents relating to 17 your case to hold them accountable, they will refuse to provide them because they want to protect their coworkers from 18 liability. This is hypocrisy. 19 4. All risk is thereby transferred to you and avoided by your public dis-servants. Consequently, there is no way to ensure 20 that they do their job by genuinely helping you, even though that is the ONLY reason they even have a job to begin 21 with. 22 In effect, what our public dis-servants are doing above is using ignorance, fear, deliberate ambiguity of law and 23 publications, and intimidation as weapons to terrorize “nontaxpayers” into paying extortion money to the government. 24 They have made every option available to you EXCEPT bribing the government into a risky endeavor, knowing full well 25 that most people will try to avoid risk. They will not help citizens defend their property, which is the ONLY legitimate 26 function of government. Based on the above, the only thing these thieves will help anyone do is bribe the government with 27 money that isn’t owed and to do so under the influence of constructive fraud, malfeasance, and breach of fiduciary duty on 28 the part of the public dis-servant. The presence of such constructive fraud makes it impossible to give informed, voluntary 29 consent in the situation, and therefore makes it impossible to willfully make a false statement. However, it is common for 30 federal judges to aid and abet in the persecution and terrorism of honest Americans who submit the above Thrift Savings 31 Program (T.S.P.), Pamphlet OC-96-21 in order to perpetuate the federal mafia and keep the stolen loot flowing that funds 32 their fat federal retirement checks. 33 Now that we have firmly established that consent is required in the assessment and collection of income taxes under 35 Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code, it’s reasonable to ask what devious and illegal means the government uses to 36 coerce “consent” or what they popularly call “voluntary compliance” out of the populace. Such coercion is called “duress” 37 in the legal field. Section 4.3.16 of the Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302 covers such techniques generally, but it is 38 reasonable to particularize the techniques down so that we can be very aware of the tools of coercion, force, and fraud used 39 directly against us in the case of income taxation. We will therefore itemize each technique into a very specific “MO”, 40 which is a “Method of Operation” used by criminal public servants for accomplishing their crime. The reason we put this 41 section at the end of the treatment of the “voluntary” nature of income taxes is so that we can start from the point of 42 knowing exactly what the lawful limits are upon the IRS’ authority. The techniques in the following subsections will be 43 listed in order of the frequency they occur. 44 10.8 Common sources of illegal government duress 69 34

Those who are subject to duress and who can prove it have standing to nullify all evidence of consent/agreement and all the 45 legal obligations arising from the consent. 46

“ An agreement [consensual contract] obtained by duress, coercion, or intimidation is invalid, since the party coerced is not exercising his free will, and the test is not so much the means by which the party is compelled to

47

48

69 Adapted from Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302, Section 5.4.24 with permission: http://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm.

Requirement for Consent

353 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________