Requirement for Consent

On the other hand, how long do you think the lies, the propaganda, and the willful and illegal abuses of our rights by would 1 continue if the following reforms were instituted and enforced upon the IRS: 2

1. Every Revenue Agent who interacts with the public had to reveal their true, full legal identity and contact information, 3 including their Social Security Number. After all, if they can ask you for it, then you should be able to do the same 4 thing. Equal protection of the laws requires it. 5 2. Use of “Pseudo names” on IRS Pocket Commissions was discontinued. 6 3. The identities of every IRS employee down to the lowest level was published on the IRS website. 7 4. Every piece of correspondence from the IRS had to be signed under penalty of perjury as required by 26 U.S.C. §6065 8 and the complete contact information and real legal name of the originator or responsible person must be identified on 9 the correspondence. 10

The answer is that the abuses would stop IMMEDIATELY. Secrecy and the fear it produces is the only thing that keeps 11 this house of cards standing, folks! 12

10.7.5 Making it difficult, inconvenient, or costly to obtain information about illegal government activities 13

Criminals, whether they are violating the Constitution or enacted statutory law, don’t want evidence about their misdeeds 14 exposed. A crime is simply any act that harms someone and was not done to them with their consent. The Freedom of 15 Information Act (F.O.I.A.) and the Privacy Act are both designed to maintain an accountable government that serves the 16 people by ensuring that people can always find out what their government is up to. Information about what the government 17 is doing can then be used to prosecute specific public servants who violated the requirement for consent and your rights. 18 Government agencies typically maintain “Public relations” offices, and also a full-time legal staff called the “disclosure 19 group” to deal with requests for information that come in from the Public because of these laws. These disclosure litigation 20 lawyers have the specific and sole function of filtering and obscuring and obfuscating information that is provided to the 21 public about the activities and employees of the agency they work for. These main purpose for doing the filtering is to 22 protect from prosecution wrongdoers within the agency. Disclosure litigation lawyers know that Fifth Amendment 23 guarantees only biological people the right to not incriminate themselves, but corporations are not covered by the Fifth 24 Amendment. The U.S. Code identifies the U.S. Government as a federal corporation in 28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A), and so the 25 silver tongued devils have to devise more devious means to conceal the truth. They are paid to lie and conceal and deceive 26 the public without actually “looking” like they are doing so. They are “poker players” for the government. 27 When you send in a Privacy Act Request or Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Request, as we have many times, that 28 focuses on some very incriminating evidence that could be used against the government, the response usually falls into one 29 of the following four categories: 30 1. The government will say the information is exempt from disclosure and cite the exemptions found in 5 U.S.C. 31 §552a(k). 32 2. The government will only provide a subset of the requested information and not explain why they omitted certain key 33 information. 34 3. The government will provide the information requested, but redact the incriminating parts. For instance, they will 35 black out the incriminating information and/or remove key pages. 36 4. If the government is involved in an enforcement action and the information you requested under the Privacy Act or 37 Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) could stop or interfere with the action because it exposes improprieties, they 38 will try to drag their feet and delay providing the information until they have the result they want. For instance, if you 39 send in a Privacy Act request for information about your tax liability, they will delay the response until after the period 40 of appeal or response is over. That way , you can’t respond or defend yourself against their illegal actions in a timely 41 fashion. 42 In the process of decoding the Individual Master Files (I.M.F.’s) of several people, we have found that the IRS very 43 carefully conceals information that would be useful in understanding what the IRS knows about a person. They use 44 complicated, computerized codes in their records for which no information is presently available about what they mean. 45 They used to make a manual called IRS Document 6209 available on their website for use in decoding IMF’s, but it was 46 taken down in 2003 so that no public information about decoding is available now. A number of people have sent Freedom 47 of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) Requests to the IRS requesting a copy of IRS Document 6209 and the IRS has responded by 48 providing a very incomplete and virtually useless version of the original manual, with key chapters removed and most of 49 the rest of the remaining information blacked out. They are obviously obstructing justice by preventing evidence of their 50

Requirement for Consent

347 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________