Requirement for Consent

4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

“taxpayer”

1

“State”

2

“United States”

3

“trade or business” “nonresident alien”

4

5

The Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302 also discusses in section 3.16 how both the IRS’ own Internal Revenue Manual and the 6 courts refuse to hold the IRS accountable for the content of their publication. The section below from the IRM below 7 clearly establishes that you can’t rely on anything on an IRS Form or publication: 8

Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.), Section 4.10.7.2.8 (05-14-1999)

9

IRS Publications

10

IRS Publications, issued by the Headquarters Office, explain the law in plain language for taxpayers and their advisors. They typically highlight changes in the law, provide examples illustrating Service positions, and include worksheets. Publications are nonbinding on the Service and do not necessarily cover all positions for a given issue. While a good source of general information, publications should not be cited to sustain a position.

11

12

13

14

Consequently, you can’t trust anything the IRS puts out on a government form or a publication, and the courts have even 15 said you can be penalized for relying on IRS advice! See the article below: 16

Federal Courts and the IRS’ Own IRM Say the IRS is NOT RESPONSIBLE for Its Actions or its Words or For Following Its Own Written Procedures , Family Guardian Fellowship http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Articles/IRSNotResponsible.htm Is it any wonder that the author of the publications is not identified and that the lies and deception contained in IRS 17 publications continues? Can you also see that if the IRS did tell the whole truth in their publications about the use of their 18 “words of art”, that almost no one would participate in the federal donation program deceitfully called a “tax”? This 19 deception and hypocrisy is unconscionable and must be righted. It can only be fixed by holding the IRS and their 20 employees just as liable for false statements in their publications as Americans are held liable for what they put on 21 government tax forms. If their publications are wrong or misleading, then the author should go to jail. All IRS publications 22 must also be signed under penalty of perjury by the IRS commissioner, just like the IRS tries to force us to do on our tax 23 forms. 24 Bureaucrats just love automation because it gives them a convenient excuse to blame the lack of their “ability” to satisfy the 26 requirement to procure your consent upon an impersonal computer that they have no control over and no one person is 27 responsible for. The most common place this happens is: 28 1. Mandating the use of Socialist Security Numbers. The Socialist Security Administration, for instance, said in a signed 29 letter we received from them that there is no requirement to either have or use a Socialist Security Number, which 30 implies that its use is “voluntary” and “consensual”. See SEDM Exhibit #07.004 31 (http://sedm.org/Exhibits/ExhibitIndex.htm). On the other hand, most government agencies when you call them up, 32 they will tell you that you HAVE to provide a Socialist Security Number in order for them to be “able” to help you or 33 to process your “application” and that their computer won’t work without it. If you tell them that they do not have 34 your consent to use a Socialist Security Number to process your application, they will tell you that they have to deny 35 you some privilege or benefit, as though them doing anything for you is a privilege and not a right. 36 2. In many cases you may want to protect your rights by providing an attachment to staple to your paper government 37 application that qualifies and defines the extent of your “consent”. We have tried this several times and they have told 38 us that they don’t keep attachments, and in fact shred not only your attachment but also the original paper application 39 after they enter only the relevant data into the computer. If you ask them if they scan in the application or the 40 attachment before shredding, they will say no. This is destroying evidence! This is also a violation of the First 41 Amendment, which guarantees us a right of free speech and to define how we communicate with our government. 42 When you complain about it, they will typically say they do this to promote “efficiency”. When you ask them if they 43 have a field to enter important notes on their terminal screen, they will say none is provided. 44 3. When a government dis-servant has violated the requirement for consent in the methods above and you call to 45 complain and find a person accountable for the problem, your public servants will knowingly use automation to avoid 46 10.7.3 Automation 25

Requirement for Consent

341 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________