Requirement for Consent

We must remember what the Bible says about this choice we have: 1

“ You shall not follow a [socialist or democratic] crowd[or “mob”] to do evil ; nor shall you testify in a dispute

2

so as to turn aside after many to pervert justice.”

3

[Exodus 23:2, Bible, NKJV]

4

“Away with you , Satan! For it is written, ‘ You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him ONLY [NOT the

5

government! ] you shall serve [with your labor or your earnings from labor].’”

6

[Jesus in Matt. 4:10 , Bible, NKJV ]

7

Therefore, there is only one righteous choice of who our “Master” can be as believers, and it isn’t man, or anything 8 including governments, that is made by man. If it isn’t God, then you have violated your contract and covenant with God 9 in the Bible. When you choose government as your Master, the tithes you used to pay to G od then are diverted to subsidize 10 your new pagan g od, the government, in the form of “income taxes”. Once you understand this important concept 11 completely, the picture becomes quite clear and the purposes behind the abuse of legal process relating to illegal income tax 12 enforcement and collection will be clear in your mind. What we are dealing with in the court system then, is essentially not 13 a legal, but a political and ideological war. The apostle Paul warned us about this inevitable ideological war, when he said: 14

“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly [and government] places .”

15

16

[Eph. 6:12, Bible, NKJV]

17

In the context of individual taxation, we now know from the preceding sections that there are no “positive laws” at the 18 federal level, other than perhaps the Constitution itself. The Internal Revenue Code is therefore a religion, and not a law, as 19 we concluded earlier. The disciples of that religion are all those who benefit financially from it by receiving socialist 20 government benefits, which are really just bribes paid from stolen money generated by this false religion. Among the 21 victims of this socialist bribery effected with loot stolen from our fellow Americans are judges, lawyers, and jurors. To 22 validate our analysis here, we will therefore prove to you scientifically in the remainder of this section that modern tax trials 23 are more “political campaigns” and “religious inquisitions” rather than valid legal processes. In a society without tax laws 24 where “voluntary compliance” must be maintained, some method of discipline must be used, and since it can’t be “law”, 25 then the tools of discipline and enforcement must then degenerate into political persecution and religious inquisition. 26 1. The statute which is being enforced must be a “positive law” which they are obligated to observe. See 1 U.S.C. 29 §204(a). Positive law means that the people consented to the enforcement of the law and its adverse impact against 30 their rights. If the statute being enforced is not a “positive law”, then the government must disclose on the record how 31 and why the defendant comes under the contractual or voluntary jurisdiction of the statute. They must prove, for 32 instance, beyond a reasonable doubt, why the person is a federal “employee” in order to enforce a “special law” statute 33 such as the Internal Revenue Code that only applies to federal employees. 34 2. Implementing regulations must be published in the federal register for the positive law statute that allow the statute to 35 be enforced. Without publishment in the federal register, no law may prescribe any kind of penalty, as we learned 36 earlier. See the following for exhaustive treatment of this subject: 37 IRS Due Process Meeting Handout , Form #03.008 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 3. Jurisdictional boundaries and requirements must be strictly observed by the court: 38 3.1. The violation of a “positive law” must occur within federal jurisdiction on land that the government can prove 39 belonged to the federal government at the time of the offense. Such records are in the possession of the 40 Department of Justice. 41 3.2. If the government is exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction, it must provide evidence of consent to the law in some 42 form, so that it is enforcing the equivalent of “private law”/contract law within a foreign jurisdiction. This 43 requirement is the essence of what the courts call “federalism”. 44 3.3. Federal judges who hear federal tax trials must maintain a domicile on federal land within the district where they 45 serve, and are unqualified to serve if they do not. 46 3.4. Since federal law applies mainly inside the federal zone, then the only people who can serve as jurors on a federal 47 trial are people born in and residing within the federal zone, and very few people meet this requirement. 48 4. The result of violating the positive law statute must harm a specific, flesh and blood individual. This is the foundation 49 of the notion of “common law”. Laws are there to protect the “sovereign”, which in this country is the People and not 50 A valid legal proceeding in a federal court against a sovereign National who lives in a state of the Union and not on land 27 within federal territorial jurisdiction must meet all the following prerequisites to be a valid: 28

Requirement for Consent

320 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________