Requirement for Consent

government into a Robinhood, which using the tools of democracy, turns a sword against its own citizens to rob from the rich to give to the poor. This leads to the downfall of democracy eventually because the

1

2

government becomes an agent of plunder.]

3

A search of the Federal Register and the C.F.R. will not find criminal sections 7201(tax evasion) and 7203(willful failure to 4 file) of Title 26 (the I.R. Code) anywhere. This fact seems to contradict the mandate of 44 U.S.C. §1505(a), which says, 5 “for the purposes of this chapter (Sec. 1501 et seq.) every document or order which prescribes a penalty has generally 6 applicability and legal effect” and that those “having general applicability and legal effect” are “required to be published.” 7 From this it would appear as though these penalty statutes should have been published in the Federal Register and the 8 C.F.R. if they were to be enforced against the public at large, but Congress very deliberately limited the application of these 9 penalty statutes and all of I.R. Code Chapter 75 to a person described in section 7343 of the I.R. Code — a person who is 10 “under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.” The person under a duty is only a person who 11 “effectively connected” himself with the U.S. Government income, an act called a “trade or business”, and willfully made 12 some of that income part of their own estate by criminal conduct, such as fraud or perjury. Upon proof of fraud or perjury, 13 the additional punishment of these statutes is applicable. Hence, sections 7201 and 7203 are not statutes of primary 14 punishment, they only provide for additional punishment after a primary criminal act has been charged and proven. Only 15 then does the U.S. Court have authority to impose the additional punishment under section 7201(tax evasion) and section 16 7203 (willful failure to file) upon such a person, and no other. 17 The Federal Government “employee” who works in the federal zone and is responsible for handling part of the U.S. 18 Government’s income is the most likely candidate to be in a position to act fraudulently with regard to that income. Such 19 person is in a fiduciary relationship with regard to the U.S. Government income and 44 U.S.C. §1501(a)(2) excepted 20 statutes that are “effective only against Federal agencies or persons in their capacity as officers, agents, or employees 21 thereof.” So, technically, section 1505(a) does not require section 7201 and section 7203 of the I.R. code to be in the 22 Federal Register or C.F.R. if it is only being enforced against federal “employees”. 23 If these statutes prescribed primary rather than secondary punishment, they would have general applicability and would be 24 required to be noticed. But, these statutes state they are additional punishment, so they cannot lawfully be used as primary 25 punishment. The fact that they are not noticed in the Federal Register as required for other types of penalties is conclusive 26 evidence that they can only be applied upon the specific persons described in section 7343 and only upon specific U.S. 27 Government income. Section 7343, in turn, only specifies that “ officer or employee of a corporation” is the party who has 28 the duty to perform, and that person is holding “public office” in the United States government ONLY. Absence in the 29 Federal Register tells that the subject matter is limited to internal revenue service and not possible to use for external (to the 30 Federal Government) revenue service. 31 With Internal Revenue Code §§7201 and 7203 being applied generally through malicious prosecutions and malicious abuse 32 of legal process, there remains only one source of authority being used by Federal Government employees against 33 Americans living in states of the Union and outside of federal jurisdiction. Unlawfulness notwithstanding, Federal 34 Government employees must be relying on authority received by judicial decisions, referred to as “case law” or “judge - 35 made law” by lawyers within and without the U.S. Government. 36

If you would like to know more detail about how the federal tax “scheme” works as described in this section, we refer you 37 to: 38

 Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302, Section 5.6.1.1 entitled “Federal Employee Kickback Position”.

39

 Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee , Form #06.002:

40

http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

41

 Social Security: Mark of the Beast , Form #11.407:

42

http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

43

10.6.5

No one in the government can lawfully consent to the socialism franchise agreement

44

As we proved earlier in section 9.4, the U.S. Supreme Court said in Milwaukee v. White, 296 U.S. 268 (1935) that the 45 obligation to pay income taxes is “quasi -contractual in nature”. In that case, they said 46

“Even if the judgment is deemed to be colored by the nature of the obligation whose validity it establishes, and we are free to re-examine it, and, if we find it to be based on an obligation penal in character, to refuse to enforce it outside the state where rendered, see Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance Co., 127 U.S. 265 , 292, et seq.

47

48

49

Requirement for Consent

312 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________