Requirement for Consent

First page Table of contents Previous page 314 Next page Last page

2.10. Whenever you are given a political or a legal choice as a jurist or voter or a parent, you have an obligation to do 1 whatever you must in order to ensure the flow of your share of the stolen “loot” from the public servant thieves 2 you work for in the federal judiciary and the IRS. 3 2.10.1. As a jurist, you must rule against all those people who try to exit the fraudulent revenue collection system 4 or who try to reform the corruption within the system. 5 2.10.2. As a voter, you must vote for the candidate who promises the most stole “loot”. 6 2.10.3. As a parent, you must train your children that they have a duty to participate in the tax system, because 7 that is where your retirement is going to come from! 8 The above is EVIL! It is the essence of socialism. Christians cannot be socialists. All socialists worship government as 9 their false god. This is Satan worship and idolatry, because it is man/government-centric instead of God centric. The Bible 10 calls such rebellion and mutiny of God’s laws “witchcraft” in 1 Sam 15:22-23. Such idolatry is punishable by death under 11 God’s law (see Ezekial 9 in the Bible). The same kind of rebellion by our public servants of the Constitution is also 12 punishable by death under 18 U.S.C. §2381. 13 Based on the above analysis, the only ethical and moral way to avoid the “roach trap statute” called the Internal Revenue 14 Code is to not accept any social welfare benefit. This is a very important point. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 15 (F.S.I.A.), codified in 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97, in fact, clearly identifies why this is the case. 28 U.S.C. §1605, part of the act, 16 contains a list of exceptions whereby a foreign sovereign forfeits its sovereign immunity in courts of justice. Two 17 exceptions in particular reveal why we can’t accept federal benefits or be “U.S. citizens”. To wit: 18 1. 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(2) says that if you conduct “commerce” within the legislative jurisdiction of the “Untied States” 19 (meaning the federal zone), then you lose your sovereign immunity. Receiving government benefits or paying for 20 them through taxation qualifies as “commerce”. 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(39) and 26 U.S.C. §7408(d) place all “persons” 21 subject to the tax code squarely within the District of Columbia regardless of where they live, which is what the 22 “United States” is defined as in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10): 23

TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 97 > § 1605

§ 1605. General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state

A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any

case —

(2) in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of

the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States;

For further confirmation of the fact that your domicile as a federal “employee” is the District of Columbia, see Federal 32 Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 17(b), which says that those acting in a representative capacity for a federal corporation, 33 which in this case is the “United States”, become subject to the laws for the domicile of the corporation, which is the 34 District of Columbia under 4 U.S.C. §72 and Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution: 35

IV. PARTIES > Rule 17.

Rule 17. Parties Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity

(b) Capacity to Sue or be Sued.

Capacity to sue or be sued is determined as follows:

(1) for an individual who is not acting in a representative capacity, by the law of the individual's domicile; (2) for a corporation [the “United States”, in this case, or its officers on official duty representing the

corporation], by the law under which it was organized; and

(3) for all other parties, by the law of the state where the court is located, except that:

(A) a partnership or other unincorporated association with no such capacity under that state's law may sue or be sued in its common name to enforce a substantive right existing under the United States Constitution

or laws; and

(B) 28 U.S.C. §§754 and 959(a) govern the capacity of a receiver appointed by a United States court to sue

or be sued in a United States court.

[SOURCE: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule17.htm]

Requirement for Consent

310 of 396

EXHIBIT:________

Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online