Requirement for Consent

cause, but in many circumstances government employees can. O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 723 (1987) (plurality opinion); id., at 732 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Private citizens cannot be punished for refusing to provide the government information that may incriminate them, but government employees can be dismissed when the incriminating information that they refuse to provide relates to the performance of their job. Gardner v. Broderick, [497 U.S. 62, 95] 392 U.S. 273, 277 -278 (1968). With regard to freedom of speech in particular: Private citizens cannot be punished for speech of merely private concern, but government employees can be fired for that reason. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Private citizens cannot be punished for partisan political activity, but federal and state employees can be dismissed and otherwise punished for that reason. Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 101 (1947); Civil Service Comm'n v. Letter Carriers, 413 U.S.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

548, 556 (1973); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 616 -617 (1973) .”

10

[Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)]

11

Every action you do, including your earnings from private life, are considered to be done on “official federal business” 12 at that point and you are a “Kelly Girl” or temp working for your private employer on loan from Uncle Sam. Your 13 private employer then became a “trustee” over what then became government earnings and not your earnings and the 14 IRS Form 1040 is the profit and loss statement for this new business trust. Your new boss and idol to be worshipped is 15 the federal government, and not God. Your continued obedience to the IRS is evidence that you worship this false god. 16 2. By virtue of being a federal public officer and officer of the “U.S. Inc.” federal corporation, then you became 17 “effectively connected with a trade or business” because “trade or business” is defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) as 18 “the functions of a public office”. 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii) and 26 C.F.R. §1.861-8(f)(1)(iv) reveal that only “aliens” 19 (residents) and “nonresident aliens” with income “effectively connected with a trade or business” can have “taxable 20 income” or be the proper subject of the code. The process of becoming “effectively connected” with federal income 21 was done through what is called an “election” in the Internal Revenue Code. This “election” is made upon either filing 22 a form W-4 that authorizes withholding or an IRS Form 1040 that indicates a nonzero liability. This contractual act of 23 “election” can be revoked using the procedures described in section 5.3.6 of the Great IRS Hoax , Form #11.302, which 24 are further described in Chapter 1 of the following: 25 Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Manual , Form #10.005 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 3. Once your earnings contractually became “effectively connected with a trade or business”, at least a portion of them 26 became “public property” and the federal government gained “in rem” jurisdiction over them by virtue of Article 4, 27 Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, even if that property is not situated on federal land or otherwise within 28 exclusive federal jurisdiction. The portion of your earnings that are considered “public property” over which they have 29 jurisdiction is that portion which you owe in “taxes” (kickbacks) at the end of the year. If you resist efforts to collect 30 property in your custody that always has belonged to the government, then all actions against you will be a “replevin”, 31 meaning an action against the property under your control and not against the “person”, which is you. 32

“ Replevin . An action whereby the owner or person entitled to repossession of goods or chattels may recover those goods or chattels from one who has wrongfully distrained or taken or who wrongfully detains such goods or chattels. Jim’s Furniture Mart, Inc. v. Harris, 42 Ill.App.3d. 488, 1 Ill.Dec. 176, 176, 356 N.E.2d. 175, 176. Also refers to a provisional remedy that is an incident of a replevin action which allows the plaintiff at any time before judgment to take the disputed property from the defendant and hold the property pendente lite. Other names for replevin include Claim and delivery, Detinue, Revendication, and Sequestration (q.v.).”

33

34

35

36

37

38

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1299]

39

4. Because your earnings as a federal public officer are “public property”, then under 5 U.S.C. §553(a)(2) and 44 U.S.C. 40 §1505(a)(1), there is no need to publish implementing regulations in the Federal Register governing the management of 41 that property. Because you volunteered to be treated as a federal “employee”, you already consented to the terms of 42 the implied employment agreement found in the Internal Revenue Code between your new “employer” (the federal 43 government) and you. Those who don’t want to be “effectively connected” simply don’t pursue federal employment or 44 volunteer to fill out any forms that would indicate they are “effectively connected”. 45 5. Because you are an “employee” and are treated under the Internal Revenue Code, Subtitles A and C as a “person” 46 whose every action is in the context of federal employment, then all monies paid to the IRS at that point literally do 47 support the “government”, because everything you do in your private life is done essentially as a government 48 “employee”. Therefore, the Internal Revenue Code literally does describe a “tax” at that point because it does support 49 only the government, of which you are part 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The only thing the government can spend 50 money on is a “public purpose”, which means the only thing they can compensate you for is services as a federal 51 “employee”: 52

“ Public purpose . In the law of taxation, eminent domain, etc., this is a term of classification to distinguish the objects for which, according to settled usage, the government is to provide, from those which, by the like usage, are left to private interest, inclination, or liberality. The constitutional requirement that the purpose of any tax,

53

54

55

Requirement for Consent

305 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________