Requirement for Consent

the United States or to the Internal Revenue Code ”. If the Internal Revenue Code were “law”, then that phrase would be 1 redundant, now wouldn’t it?: 2

Oregon Revised Statutes

3

316.012 Terms have same meaning as in federal laws; federal law references . Any term used in this chapter has the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the laws of the United States relating to federal income taxes, unless a different meaning is clearly required or the term is specifically defined in this chapter. Except where the Legislative Assembly has provided otherwise, any reference in this chapter to the laws of the

4

5

6

7

United States or to the Internal Revenue Code :

8

(1) Refers to the laws of the United States or to the Internal Revenue Code as they are amended and in effect:

9

(a) On December 31, 2002; or

10

(b) If related to the definition of taxable income and attributable to a change in the laws of the United States or in the Internal Revenue Code that is enacted after December 31, 2005, as applicable to the

11

12

tax year of the taxpayer.

13

(2) Refers to the laws of the United States or to the Internal Revenue Code as they are amended and in effect

14

and applicable for the tax year of the taxpayer, if the reference relates to:

15

[SOURCE: http://landru.leg.state.or.us/ors/316.html]

16

Here is what one book on the common law candidly admits. Note that the Harvard law professor writing the book, Rosco 17 Pound, describes TWO classes of statutes: 1. “law”; 2. “compact”, meaning franchise: 18

Municipal law, thus understood, is properly defined to be "a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme

19

power in a state, commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong."

20

[. . .]

21

It is also called a rule to distinguish it from a compact or agreement; for a compact is a promise proceeding from us, law is a command directed to us . The language of a compact is, "I will, or will not, do this"; that of a law is, "thou shalt, or shalt not, do it." It is true there is an obligation which a compact carries with it, equal in point of conscience to that of a law; but then the original of the obligation is different. In compacts we ourselves determine and promise what shall be done, before we are obliged to do it; in laws. we are obliged to act without ourselves determining or promising anything at all. Upon these accounts law is defined to be "a

22

23

24

25

26

27

rule."

28

[Readings on the History and System of the Common Law, Second Edition, Roscoe Pound, 1925, p. 4]

29

If the Internal Revenue Code is not “positive law”, but a voluntary franchise contract or “compact” as indicated above, then 30 what exactly is it? It is a de facto state-sponsored Federal/Political Religion. Below is how one Christian Writer describes 31 this state-sponsored de facto religion: 32

“There is a war on. Since 1975, hundreds of thousands of Christians in the United States have become aware of the threat to Christianity posed by humanism. It is amazing how long it took for Christians to recognize that

33

34

humanism is a rival religion: about a century.”

35

[75 Bible Questions Your Instructors Pray You Won’t Ask, Gary North, 1984, 1988, ISBN 0-930462-03-3, p. 1]

36

You can read the above free book yourself at the address below: 37

75 Bible Questions Your Instructors Pray You Won’t Ask, Gary North, 1984, 1988, ISBN 0-930462-03-3 http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Spirituality/Articles/75BibleQuestions.pdf

The Internal Revenue Code is “de facto” because there is no positive law passed by Congress that actually implements it. 38 Only those who consent to follow it can have any legal obligation to follow it, because it prescribes no legal duties upon 39 anyone but federal public officers, statutory “employees” (5 U.S.C. §2105(a)), contractors, agencies, and benefit recipients. 40 Its existence outside of the federal workplace, such as in the lives of private Americans living or working in the states of the 41 Union, was created and continues to be maintained by constructive fraud using “judge -made law”, which is de facto law put 42 in place by the edicts of covetous criminals sitting on the federal bench. This type of law can only exist as long as there are 43

Requirement for Consent

291 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________