Requirement for Consent

2. An “unalienable right” is one that you AREN’T ALLOWED BY LAW to consent to give away in relation to a real, de 1 jure government! Such a right cannot lawfully be sold, bargained away, or transferred through any commercial 2 process, INCLUDING A FRANCHISE. Hence, even if we consent, the forfeiture of such rights is unconstitutional, 3 unauthorized, and a violation of the fiduciary duty to the public officer we surrender them to. 4

“Unalienable. Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.”

5

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 1693]

6

3. The only place you can lawfully give up constitutional rights is where they physically do not exist, which is among 7 those domiciled on AND physically present on federal territory not part of any state of the Union. 8

“Indeed, the practical interpretation put by Congress upon the Constitution has been long continued and uniform to the effect [182 U.S. 244, 279] that the Constitution is applicable to territories acquired by purchase or conquest, only when and so far as Congress shall so direct. Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government' (art. 4, 4), by which we understand, according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme power resides in the whole body of the people, and is exercised by representatives elected by them,' Congress did not hesitate, in the original organization of the territories of Louisiana, Florida, the Northwest Territory, and its subdivisions of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Wisconsin and still more recently in the case of Alaska, to establish a form of government bearing a much greater analogy to a British Crown colony than a republican state of America , and to vest the legislative power either in a governor and council, or a governor and judges, to be appointed by the President. It was not until they had attained a certain population that power was given them to organize a legislature by vote of the people. In all these cases, as well as in territories subsequently organized west of the Mississippi, Congress thought it necessary either to extend to Constitution and laws of the United States over them, or to declare that the inhabitants should be entitled to enjoy the right of trial by jury, of bail, and of the

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, as well as other privileges of the bill of rights.”

23

[Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]

24

4. All de jure governments are created exclusively to protect PRIVATE RIGHTS. The way you protect them is to 25 LEAVE THEM ALONE and not burden their exercise in any way. A lawful de jure government cannot and does not 26 protect your rights by making a business out of destroying, regulating, and taxing their exercise, implement the 27 business as a franchise, and hide the nature of what they are doing as a franchise and an excise. This would cause and 28 has caused the money changers to take over the charitable public trust and “civic temple” and make it into a 29 whorehouse in violation of the Constitutional trust indenture. This kind of money changing in fact, is the very reason 30 that Jesus flipped tables over in the temple out of anger: Turning the bride of Christ and God’s minister for justice into 31 a WHORE. The nuns are now pimped out and the church is open for business for all the statutory “taxpayer” Johns 32 who walk in. 33

The above explains why:

34

1. The geographical definitions within every franchise we have seen, including the Income Tax, Social Security, etc., 35 limit themselves to federal territory exclusively and include no part of any state of the Union. 36 2. The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court, limits what you can consent to in the context of 37 franchises. 38 3. The U.S. Supreme Court held the following about licenses enforced in areas protected by the Constitution, keeping in 39 mind that licensing implements franchises: 40

". . .the acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provisions of the statute . . . that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. "

41

42

[Power Mfg. Co. v. Saunders, 274 U.S. 490 (1927)]

43

10.5.6 How franchises are stealthily introduced and propagated by a corrupted government within jurisdictions 44 outside their territory 45

The states of the Union are foreign and alien and sovereign in respect to the national government. Maintaining that 46 separation of legislative powers, in fact, is one of the main purposes of the United States Constitution: 47

“We start with first principles. The Constitution creates a Federal Government of enumerated powers. See U.S. Const., Art. I, 8. As James Madison wrote, "[t]he powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." The Federalist No. 45, pp. 292-293 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). This constitutionally mandated division of authority "was adopted by the Framers to ensure protection of our fundamental liberties." Gregory v.

48

49

50

51

52

Requirement for Consent

268 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________