Requirement for Consent

2.1. Excluding your evidence from the proceeding. 1 2.2. Calling you “frivolous” without entering evidence on the record PROVING that you are incorrect. 2 3. Not mentioning anything about “agreement” or “contract” on the form, but only in the regulations that usually only the 3 agency will read. This is the case of the IRS Form W-4. How many of you knew that the W-4 form was indeed a 4 binding legal contract? The regulations in turn can and do bind only government officers and agents and not private 5 people. By hiding their secrets in the regulations that only regulate activities of government actors, indirectly they are 6 admitting that the statute sought to be enforced only binds the government and not the general public. 7 4. Destroying or interfering with all other alternatives to what the government is offering so that you must accept the 8 government’s offer. For instance 9 4.1. Those who do not wish to get a state-issued marriage license may lawfully draft their own private contract and 10 record it at the county recorder. The government’s method for interfering with this process is to refuse to record 11 anything at the recorder’s office other than government-issued applications. In many cases, they will not allow 12 parties to record private contracts, because it undermines their monopoly. 13 4.2. Those who do not wish to obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number are often refused in opening bank accounts as 14 a matter of bank policy rather than as a requirement of law. This forces private individuals into becoming 15 taxpayers subject to IRS supervision just in order to conduct their financial affairs. 16 4.3. Those who do not wish to pay property tax may elect to quitclaim their property to an unnamed third party and 17 file the quitclaim with the country recorder. At that point, the government cannot enforce the payment of 18 property taxes because it does not know who the property owner is. Some county governments interfere with this 19 tactic by refusing to record such documents, even though this is perfectly legal and an extension of our protected 20 right to contract. We have a right to keep our private contracts secret from the government if we wish, and to not 21 have the government account for or track who owns our property if we choose. 22 5. Inviting you to attend a court hearing at “federal church”, also called “district court”: 23 5.1. The judge will use non-positive law franchise statute and PRESUME you are a party to it. For instance, he/she 24 will PRESUME that you are a “taxpayer” unless you prove you are not. See 26 U.S.C. §7491. This is a prejudice 25 to your constitutional rights and according to the Supreme Court, is a violation of due process. See: 26 http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/Presumption-RPG-Federal.pdf 27 5.2. If you show up and do not do any of the following, the judge will usually falsely PRESUME that you are subject 28 to exclusive and general federal jurisdiction. 29 5.2.1. Appear by special rather than general appearance. A general appearance subjects you to the general rather 30 than special jurisdiction of the court. 31 5.2.2. Do not challenge jurisdiction in your response. Jurisdiction is “assumed” if you do not challenge it. 32 5.2.3. Do not claim diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1332. Consequently, they will assume you are a 33 domiciliary of the federal zone and that you are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal 34 government. 35 5.3. The judge will falsely assume that you are subject to whatever code or title you quote in your pleading. You can’t 36 cite a code or statute that you aren’t subject to. 37 5.4. The judge will falsely assume that you agree with everything you didn’t explicitly disagree with in your response 38 to the government’s Complaint. This creates a tremendous burden of effort to deflect false government charges if 39 the government’s pleading is long. 40 Consequently, we must be very aware of the use of the above tactics in procuring or establishing evidence of our consent. 41 We can give consent without even realizing it, if we are ignorant of the law and of legal process and especially the false 42 presumptions which it employs. The key to preserving our God-given rights is to understand how these tactics of procuring 43 “invisible consent” by false presumption operate and to openly and forcefully challenge their exercise on every occasion 44 that they are employed. 45 As you can see from the previous discussion, understanding PRESUMPTIONS and the violations of due process of law 46 they perpetuate is KEY to avoiding and preventing the government from invisibly acquiring your consent. The subject of 47 presumptions is exhaustively covered in: 48

Presumption: Chief Weapon for Unlawfully Enlarging Federal Jurisdiction , Form #05.017 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The subject of “invisible consent” is further discussed in the following resources on our website: 49

Requirement for Consent

249 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________