Requirement for Consent

Debt and contract [franchise agreement, in this case] are of no particular place.

1

Locus contractus regit actum.

2

The place of the contract [franchise agreement, in this case] governs the act.

3

[ Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856;

4

SOURCE: http://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htm]

5

5. Both debt and contracts require consent of the other party to the relationship. 6 6. Consent cannot be PRESUMED, but must be PROVEN by those who are enforcing a duty under the contract or 7 franchise. 8 7. The only way they can lawfully through legislation reach outside their territory and inside the “cookie jar”, which are 9 the legislatively “foreign states” called states of the Union, is through the operation of “private law” for nearly all 10 subject matters except interstate and foreign commerce. 11

10.2.2 How they deceive you into thinking that PRIVATE law is PUBLIC law that you must obey 12

Corrupt and covetous governments know that since private law requires explicit consent and that most people would not 13 voluntarily give up their life, liberty, property, or sovereignty, that the only way they are going to procure such consent is 14 by fooling them into believing that private law is public law that everyone MUST obey. They do this by the following 15 means: 16 1. They will pretend like a “private law” is a “public law”. This is done by calling voluntary franchises “law” rather than 17 “PRIVATE law”. 18 2. They will deny attempts to characterize their activities truthfully as “private law” both in the laws they publish and 19 their court rulings. 20 3. They will call their enactment a “code” but never refer to it as a “law”. It doesn’t become “law” for anyone until they 21 explicitly consent to it. All “law” implicitly conveys rights to the parties, and no rights exist where there is no one who 22 consents to a “code”! Look at 1 U.S.C. §204 and you will see that Title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code is never 23 referred to as a “law” but simply a “Title”. 24 4. They will define those who are “subject” as including “citizens or residents”, but define “citizen” or “resident” as a 25 voluntary statutory franchise rather than a CONSTITUTIONAL “citizen”. Thus, consent is given indirectly by simply 26 volunteering for the “citizen” or “resident” franchise. When you point out that duties cannot be imposed upon 27 CONSTITUTIONAL “citizens” because it violates the Thirteenth Amendment and that the “citizen” or “resident” is a 28 public office in the government, they will FRAUDULENTLY deny that this is true. For an example of this, see the 29 definition of “U.S. person” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30) . 30 5. They will call those who consent “residents” and those who don’t consent “aliens” or “transient foreigners”. By doing 31 this, they aren’t implying that you LIVE within their jurisdiction, but instead that you are a party to their private law 32 contract who has a “res”, which is a collection of rights and benefits “ident” -ified within their jurisdiction. Sneaky, 33 huh? 34

Resident . “Any person who occupies a dwelling within the State, has a present intent to remain within the State for a period of time, and manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the State together with indicia that his presence within the State is something other than merely transitory in nature. The word “resident” when used as a noun means a dweller, habitant or occupant; one who resides or dwells in a place for a period of more, or less, duration; it signifies one having a residence, or one who resides or abides. [Hanson v. P.A. Peterson Home Ass’n, 35 Ill.App.2d. 134, 182 N.E.2d. 237, 240]

35

36

37

38

39

40

[Underlines added]

41

Word “resident” has many meanings in law, largely determined by statutory context in which it is used. [Kelm

42

v. Carlson, C.A.Ohio, 473 F.2d. 1267, 1271] [ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1309]

43

44

The term “the State” they are referring to in the case of most private law usually means “the government” and not the 45 people that it serves. Everyone who is party to the private law or special law usually are agents, public officers, or 46 “employees” of the government in one form or another. See the following for proof: 47 Why Your Government is Either a Thief or You are a “Public Officer” for Income Tax Purposes , Form #05.008 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 6. They will try to make the process of consenting “invisible” and keep you unaware that you are consenting. 48

Requirement for Consent

240 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________