Requirement for Consent

laws of that sovereign. This is because every nation, state, or foreign sovereign has an inherent and natural right of 1 self-defense. Implicit in this right is the God-given authority to use whatever force is necessary to prevent an injury to 2 their person, property, or liberty from the malicious or harmful acts of others. 3 4. When a man sticks his pecker in a hole, he is presumed to implicitly consent to all the obligations arising out of such a 4 “privilege”. This includes implied consent to pay all child support obligations that might accrue in the future by virtue 5 of such an act. Marriage licenses are the state’s vain attempt to protect the owner of the hole from being injured by 6 either irresponsible visitors or their poor discretion in choosing or allowing visitors, and not a whole lot more. In this 7 context, as in nearly all other contexts, the government offers a privilege or “license” which essentially amounts to a 8 form of “liability insurance”. You can only benefit from the insurance program by voluntarily “signing up” when you 9 make application to procure the license. 10 5. When a person avails themselves of a commercial statutory or franchise “ benefit ” or “privilege” offered by the 11 government, they implicitly consent to be bound by all the obligations arising out of it. 12

CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS PART 2. CONTRACTS CHAPTER 3. CONSENT

13

14

15

16

Section 1589

17 18

1589. A voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a transaction is equivalent to a consent to all the obligations

19

arising from it, so far as the facts are known, or ought to be known, to the person accepting.

20

Below are some examples of statutory franchise “benefits” that might fit this description, all of which amount to the 21 equivalent of private insurance offered by what amounts to a for profit, government-owned corporation : 22 5.1. Social Security. 23 5.2. Medicare. 24 5.3. Unemployment insurance. 25 5.4. Federal employment. Anyone who exercises their right to contract in order to procure federal employment 26 implicitly agrees to be bound by all of Title 5 of the United States Code. 27 5.5. Registering a vehicle. You are not required to register your vehicle in a state. Most people do it to provide added 28 protection of their ownership over the vehicle. When they procure this privilege, they also confer upon the state 29 the right to require those who drive the vehicle to use a license. A vehicle that is not so registered, and especially 30 by a non-domiciled person, can lawfully be driven by such a person without the need for a driver’s license. 31 5.6. Professional licenses. A “license” is legally defined as permission by the state to do that which is otherwise 32 illegal. A professional licenses is simply an official recognition of a person’s professional status. It is illegal to 33 claim the benefits of that recognition unless you possess the license. The government has moral and legal 34 authority to prevent you only from engaging in criminal and harmful behaviors, not ALL behaviors. Therefore, 35 the only thing they can lawfully “license” are potentially harmful activities, such as manufacturing or selling 36 alcohol, drugs, medical equipment, or toxic substances. Any other type of license, such as an attorney license, is 37 a voluntary privilege that they cannot prosecute you for refusing to engage in. 38 5.7. Driver’s licenses. All states can only issue or require driver’s licenses of those domiciled in federal areas or 39 territory within the exterior limit of the state. They cannot otherwise regulate the free exercise of a right. Since 40 federal territory or federal areas are the only place where these legal rights do NOT exist, then this is the only 41 place they can lawfully regulate the right to travel. 42 5.8. Statutory marriage. Most states have outlawed common law marriage. Consequently, the only way you can 43 become subject to the Family Code in your state is to voluntarily procure a government license to marry. 44 When a foreign state explicitly (in writing) or implicitly (through their conduct) consents to the jurisdiction of a sister 45 Forum or State, they are deemed to be “present” within that state legally, but not necessarily physically. Here is how the 46 Ninth Circuit Court of Federal Appeals describes this concept: 47

In International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the Supreme Court held that a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant consistent with due process only if he or she has "certain minimum contacts" with the relevant forum "such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.' " Id. at 316 (quoting Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 (1940)). Unless a defendant's contacts with a forum are so substantial, continuous, and systematic that the defendant can be deemed to be "present" in that forum for all purposes, a forum may exercise only "specific" jurisdiction - that is, jurisdiction based on the relationship between the defendant's forum contacts and the

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

plaintiff's claim.

55

[. . .]

56

Requirement for Consent

230 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________