Requirement for Consent

the legal field by the following names and you can also find it in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b)(6), which says that a 1 failure to deny constitutes an admission for the purposes of meeting the burden of proving a fact: 2

1. 2. 3.

Implied consent.

3

Constructive consent.

4

Tacit procuration.

5

“ Procuration.. Agency; proxy; the act of constituting another one's attorney in fact. The act by which one person gives power to another to act in his place, as he could do himself. Action under a power of attorney or other constitution of agency. Indorsing a bill or note "by procuration" is doing it as proxy for another or by his authority. The use of the word procuration (usually, per procuratione, or abbreviated to per proc. or p. p.) on a

6

7

8

9

promissory note by an agent is notice that the agent has but a limited authority to sign.

10

An express procuration is one made by the express consent of the parties. An implied or tacit procuration takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs and does not interfere to prevent it. Procurations are also divided into those which contain absolute power, or a general authority, and those which give only a limited power. Also, the act or offence of procuring women for lewd purposes. See also Proctor. ”

11

12

13

14

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 1086-1087]

15

Notice the above phrase “act or offense of procuring women for lewd purposes”. This describes basically the act of 16 hiring a WHORE, and that is EXACTLY what you become if condone or allow the government do this to you, folks! 17 This fact explains EXACTLY who Babylon the Great Harlot is as described in the Bible Book of Revelation. Babylon 18 the Great Harlot is a symbol or metaphor for all those who are willing to trade their virtue, allegiance, or control over 19 their property or liberty over to a government in exchange for a life of pleasure, ignorance, luxury, and irresponsibility. 20 She is fornicating with “The Beast ”, which is described in Revelation 19:19 as “the kings of the earth”, who today are 21 our modern corrupted political rulers. 22 4. Retraxit by tacit procuration. This is where you withdraw your standing to claim rights in any matter as Plaintiff. 23

“ Retraxit. Lat. He has withdrawn. A retraxit is a voluntary renunciation by plaintiff in open court of his suit and cause thereof, and by it plaintiff forever loses his action. Virginia Concrete Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Fairfax County, 197 Va. 821, 91 S.E.2d. 415, 419. It is equivalent to a verdict and judgment on the merits of the case and bars another suit for the same cause between the same parties. Datta v. Staab, 343 P.2d. 977, 982, 173 C.A.2d 613. Under rules practice, this is accomplished by a voluntary dismissal. Fed.R.Civi1 P. 41(a). ”

24

25

26

27

28

[ Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 1183-1185]

29

The courts w on’t document and will vociferously avoid explaining or justifying these prejudicial presumptions about the 30 use of government identifying numbers because if they did, then you would understand where their jurisdiction derives and 31 withdraw yourself from it and destroy the only source of their jurisdiction. The courts also know that all “presumption” is a 32 violation of due process that is unconstitutional if it undermines your Constitutional rights so they will never call it what it 33 is because it will destroy most of their authority and importance. This is exhaustively explained in the following pamphlet: 34

Presumption: Chief Weapon for Unlawfully Enlarging Federal Jurisdiction , Form #05.017 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

Therefore, the above is just something you have to know and practical experience has taught us that this is the truth. If you 35 would like to learn more about how the above process is used to lawfully deceive and enslave the legally ignorant and 36 unsuspecting American “sheep” public at large, read the following fascinating and very enlightening document: 37

Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee , Form #06.002 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

9.11.6 How corrupt governments illegally procure “implied consent” of People to waive their sovereign immunity 38

According to the courts, the waivers of sovereign immunity by the U.S. government cannot lawfully be procured through 39 “implied consent” and must be EXPLICITLY stated in writing. Hence, the SAME standard applies to PEOPLE by 40 implication, under the concept of equal protection and equal treatment that is the foundation of the United States 41 Constitution. 42

In analyzing whether Congress has waived the immunity of the United States, we must construe waivers strictly in favor of the sovereign, see McMahon v. United States, 342 U.S. 25, 27 (1951), and not enlarge the waiver "

43

44

Requirement for Consent

228 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________