Requirement for Consent

This case resulted in my filing a criminal complaint against the defendants with the U.S. Attorney, and petitioning Congress 1 to open impeachment proceedings against five federal judges for conspiracy to commit extortion, accompanied with a copy 2 of the proposed Federal J.A.I.L. Bill, with my instant case as an example of why Congress should pass J.A.I.L. into law. 3 Everything grew very quiet. No one would say anything. 4

All this over the implied assumption that I had entered into a "Contract Agreement" that did not exist, and never did exist. 5

Here in Los Angeles, the city dispenses bureaucrats throughout the city to search your home. However, the city likes to 6 refer to it as "inspection." Although the U.S. Constitution provides: 7

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be

8

9

10

seized"

11

[Fourth Amendment]

12

these bureaucrats come to you "for your good," as a "public service." They charge you money for their services, and 13 exercise police power, having neither oath or affirmation, warrant, or probable cause, mandating you "volunteer" to accept 14 their searches. If you refuse to volunteer, they turn you over to the city prosecutor who will prosecute you for failure to 15 comply with the program. If you think these bureaucrats are bribe-free, you have a shock coming. Many hint at and suggest 16 that they can arrange special treatment for you, or that they can make things very bad for you. 17 We have now come to the point in this country where the public's common acceptance that we are administrative subjects, 18 that a mere suggestion by a government bureaucrat has now become law, and one is guilty by the simple allegation of 19 whatever charge these bureaucrats wish to lay upon them without appeal to the Constitution. 20 Approximately seven years ago I was stopped by a police officer. He "offered" to engage me into a contract with him. The 21 problem with his contract offer was that it was imposed upon me by the threat of my going immediately to jail, and that of 22 having my car stolen. Under criminal constitutional standards he was required to take me before a magistrate at least within 23 48 hours of his conducting my arrest. He did not wish to do that however, so for his convenience, not mine, he asked me to 24 enter into a contract with him. But what was my consideration in this contract? Was it that I didn't have to go to jail 25 immediately? Nay, for that is like placing a gun to one's head and asking them to voluntarily write a check, which is called 26 "Robbery" in the criminal codes. 27 This nice policeman told me that by signing his ticket, I was not waiving any of my rights. I read it, and all it said was that 28 I promised to appear before the clerk of the court authorized to receive bail by a certain date. I went ahead and took the 29 comfortable route, and signed his contract under duress, "agreeing" to appear before the court clerk as opposed to going to 30 jail. I then went to the clerk of the court by the date specified and asked if she was the clerk of the court authorized to 31 accept bail. She said "Yes." I then told her who I was, and that since she was the authorized person before whom I had 32 promised to appear, I needed her signature showing I had fulfilled my promise. She refused. Gee, what's wrong with these 33 people? They demand my signature to show up before them under threat of going to jail. I show up as they ask and request 34 their signature to show that I have complied, and they refuse. They do not respect you for keeping your promise to them. It 35 seems they are not satisfied, and they want something more from you than they made you promise. Hmmm, it seems to me 36 that not all the terms of the contract were revealed when the officer said all I had to do was appear in front of the clerk. I 37 must have been defrauded. 38 What they really wanted, and now demanded, was that I appear before a commissioner, not a judge, when originally I was 39 entitled under the Constitution to appear before a magistrate for a determination of probable cause of my arrest by the kind 40 police officer. The officer must have lied to me when I was clearly told that I would not be waiving any of my rights. But 41 a waiver of my rights under the Constitution requires my voluntary and knowledgeable consent with a consideration in the 42 pie for me. But I never got the pie. This "Contract Agreement" does not seem to be like saying "I do" at the altar and 43 getting a wife, or "I agree" at the Civil Service interview, and getting a paycheck. 44

This commissioner bullied me, trying to induce me by force to enter into his offered contract agreement, when in no way 45 was he qualified to act or perform pursuant to the Fourth Amendment requirements of a magistrate. 46

When he failed to convince me that it was in my best interest that I should voluntarily agree to his contract, he proceeded to 47 unilaterally enter me into his contract whether I agreed to it or not. And of course, it was done with "my best interest at 48

Requirement for Consent

198 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________