Requirement for Consent

[SOURCE: http://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/ch13s01.html]

1

The other great thing about being a nonresident, is that the statute of limitations under civil law DO NOT apply to you and 2 do not limit your rights or the protection of those rights. 3

1. If you invoke the common law rather than statutory law, you have an unlimited amount of time to sue a federal actor 4 for a tort. All such statutes of limitations are franchises to which BOTH parties to the suit must be contractors under 5 the social contract/compact in order to enforce. 6 2. If only one party is a “citizen” or a “resident” protected by the social contract, and the other party is protected by the 7 Constitution but not the civil law implementing the social contract, then the Constitution trumps the civil law and 8 becomes self-executing under what is called a Constitutional Tort Action. 9

Why do we say these things? Because what you think of as civil law, in most cases, is really only a private law franchise 10 for government officers and statutory “employees”, as exhaustively proven in the following document: 11

Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons , Form #05.037 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

Under the concepts in the above document, a “statute of limitations” is an example of a “privilege and immunity” afforded 12 to ONLY government officers and statutory “employees” when the OTHER party they injure is also a government officer 13 or employee in some capacity. If the injured party is not party to the social compact and franchise but is protected by the 14 Constitution, then the statutes of limitations cannot be invoked under the franchise. 15

9.2.5

TWO social compacts in America

16

In the United States (the country), there are, in fact TWO “social contracts” or “social compacts”, and each protects a 17 different subset of the overall population. 18

“It is clear that Congress, as a legislative body, exercise two species of legislative power: the one, limited as to its objects, but extending all over the Union: the other, an absolute, exclusive legislative power over the District of Columbia. The preliminary inquiry in the case now before the Court, is, by virtue of which of these

19

20

21

authorities was the law in question passed?”

22

[ Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821) ]

23

You can only be a party to ONE of these two social contracts/compacts at a time, because you can only have a domicile in 24 ONE jurisdiction at a time. These two jurisdictions that Congress legislates for are: 25

1. The states of the Union under the requirements of the Constitution of the United States. In this capacity, it is called the 26 “federal/general government”. 27 2. The U.S. government, the District of Columbia, U.S. possessions and territories, and enclaves within the states. In this 28 capacity, it is called the “national government”. The authority for this jurisdiction derives from Article 1, Section 8, 29 Clause 17 of the United States Constitution. All laws passed essentially amount to municipal laws for federal property, 30 and in that capacity, Congress is not restrained by either the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. We call the collection 31 of all federal territories, possessions, and enclaves within the states “the federal zone” throughout this document. 32

The “separation of powers doctrine” is what created these two separate and distinct social compacts and jurisdictions. Each 33 has its own courts, unique types of “citizens”, and laws. That doctrine is described in: 34

Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers , Form #05.023 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The U.S. Supreme Court has identified the maintenance of separation between these two distinct jurisdictions as THE 35 MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION OF ANY COURT. Are the courts satisfying their most important function, or have 36 they bowed to political expediency by abusing deception and words of art to entrap and enslave you in what amounts to a 37 criminal conspiracy against your constitutional rights? Have the courts become what amounts to a modern day Judas, who 38 sold the truth for the twenty pieces of silver they could STEAL from you through illegal tax enforcement by abusing word 39 games? 40

Requirement for Consent

157 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________