Requirement for Consent

Taney in the License Cases, 5 How. 583, "are nothing more or less than the powers of government inherent

1

in every sovereignty, . . . that is to say, . . . the power to govern men and things."

2

[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876),

3

SOURCE: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6419197193322400931]

4

__________________________________________________________________________________________

5

“The power to "legislate generally upon" life, liberty, and property [of PRIVATE citizens], as opposed to the "power to provide modes of redress" against offensive state action, was "repugnant" to the Constitution. Id., at 15. See also United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214, 218 (1876); United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629, 639 (1883); James v. Bowman, 190 U.S. 127, 139 (1903). Although the specific holdings of these early cases might have been superseded or modified, see, e.g., Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964); United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), their treatment of Congress' §5 power as corrective or preventive,

6

7

8

9

10

11

not definitional, has not been questioned.”

12

[ City of Boerne v. Florez, Archbishop of San Antonio, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) ]

13

To regulate private conduct with the civil law would, in fact, not only be repugnant to the Constitution, but would violate 14 the very purpose of the establishment of government, which is to protect PRIVATE rights, and would constitute 15 involuntary servitude and slavery in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. Remember also that the Thirteenth 16 Amendment prevents slavery EVERYWHERE, including on federal territory. Therefore, even if they can kidnap your 17 identity and transport it to the federal zone, they STILL need your consent to fill the public office called “taxpayer” that is 18 the surety for their reckless expense of public monies to bribe you to vote for them 21 : 19

“That it does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, is too clear for argument. Slavery implies involuntary servitude — a state of bondage; the ownership of mankind as a chattel, or at least the control of the labor and services of one man for the benefit of another, and the absence of a legal right to the disposal of his own person, property, and services [in their entirety]. This amendment was said in the Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall, 36, to have been intended primarily to abolish slavery, as it had been previously known in this country, and that it equally forbade Mexican peonage or the Chinese coolie trade, when they amounted to slavery or involuntary servitude and that the use of the word ‘servitude’ was intended to prohibit the use of all forms of involuntary slavery, of “Other authorities to the same effect might be cited. It is not open to doubt that Congress may enforce the Thirteenth Amendment by direct legislation, punishing the holding of a person in slavery or in involuntary servitude except as a punishment for a crime. In the exercise of that power Congress has enacted these sections denouncing peonage, and punishing one who holds another in that condition of involuntary servitude. This legislation is not limited to the territories or other parts of the strictly national domain, but is operative in the states and wherever the sovereignty of the United States extends. We entertain no doubt of the validity of this legislation, or of its applicability to the case of any person holding another in a state of peonage, and this whether there be municipal ordinance or state law sanctioning such holding. It operates directly on every whatever class or name. ” [Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 542 (1896)]

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

citizen of the Republic, wherever his residence may be. ”

38

[Clyatt v. U.S., 197 U.S. 207 (1905)]

39

In law, all franchises are considered contracts:

40

As a rule, franchises spring from contracts between the sovereign power and private citizens , made upon valuable considerations, for purposes of individual advantage as well as public benefit, 22 and thus a franchise partakes of a double nature and character. So far as it affects or concerns the public, it is publici juris and is subject to governmental control. The legislature may prescribe the manner of granting it, to whom it may be granted, the conditions and terms upon which it may be held, and the duty of the grantee to the public in exercising it, and may also provide for its forfeiture upon the failure of the grantee to perform that duty. But when granted, it becomes the property of the grantee, and is a private right, subject only to the governmental

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

control growing out of its other nature as publici juris. 23 [American Jurisprudence 2d, Franchises, §4: Generally (1999)]

48

49

21 We also wish to emphasize that it is a CRIME to try to bribe anyone to procure a public office, meaning it is a CRIME to bribe an otherwise private party to assume a public office in the U.S. government, and to do so with public monies. See 18 U.S.C. §210. The IRS therefore has to commit a crime before it can convert a private human being outside its jurisdiction to waive sovereign immunity and misrepresent their status as a resident alien “taxpayer” if they started out as a “non -resident NON- person”. 22 Georgia R. & Power Co. v. Atlanta, 154 Ga. 731, 115 S.E. 263; Lippencott v. Allander, 27 Iowa 460; State ex rel. Hutton v. Baton Rouge, 217 La. 857, 47 So.2d. 665; Tower v. Tower & S. Street R. Co. 68 Minn 500, 71 N.W. 691. 23 Georgia R. & Power Co. v. Atlanta, 154 Ga. 731, 115 S.E. 263; Lippencott v. Allander, 27 Iowa 460; State ex rel. Hutton v. Baton Rouge, 217 La. 857, 47 So.2d. 665; Tower v. Tower & S. Street R. Co. 68 Minn 500, 71 N.W. 691.

Requirement for Consent

128 of 396

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.003, Rev. 7-23-2013

EXHIBIT:________