Money Laundering Scam

23.1 A ¼ ounce American Eagle gold coin has a face value of ten dollars. . . and

1

23.2 A one ounce American Eagle has a face value of $50…and 2 23.3 The amount of precious metal contained in these two coins is NOT proportional to the weight. 3

Table 3: Non-proportionality of American Eagle Gold Coins

4

#

American Eagle Gold Coin Size

Face value

Value of gold in face value dollars per ounce

1 2 3

1 ounce ½ ounce ¼ ounce

$50 $25 $10

$50 $50 $40

See also: U.S. Mint Website: http://www.usmint.gov/

5

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

6

24. Admit that American Eagle Coins issued by the U.S. Mint are an abomination to the Lord because they implement an 7 unjust weight and measure not making the amount of precious metal in the coin proportional to the face value. 8

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

9

25. Admit that the following phrase found on currently issued Federal Reserve Notes does NOT appear in any statute in Title 10 12 of the U.S. Code or in any statute from the Statutes At Large currently in force: 11

“ THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ”

12

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

13

26. Admit that the last statute that did expressly use the above language was found in H.J.R. 192, 48 Stat. 112-113, which 14 was repealed when Title 31 was codified into positive law in 1982 with Public Law 97-258, 96 Stat. 1068. 15

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

16

27. Admit that the only authority statute currently in force that identifies the legal tender status of current Federal Reserve 17 Notes is 12 U.S.C. §411, which says on this subject: 18

12 U.S.C. §411

19

The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks

20

and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues.

21

28. Admit that the language of 12 U.S.C. §411 says NOTHING about “private debts” and that the ability to regulate 22 PRIVATE conduct is “repugnant to the Constitution” as held by the U.S. Supreme Court. 23

“The power to "legislate generally upon [PRIVATE] " life, liberty, and property, as opposed to the "power to provide modes of redress" against offensive state action, was "repugnant" to the Constitution. Id., at 15. See also United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214, 218 (1876); United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629, 639 (1883); James v. Bowman, 190 U.S. 127, 139 (1903). Although the specific holdings of these early cases might have been superseded or modified, see, e.g., Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964); United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), their treatment of Congress' §5 power as corrective or preventive, not

24

25

26

27

28

29

definitional, has not been questioned.”

30

[ City of Boerne v. Florez, Archbishop of San Antonio, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) ]

31

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

32

29. Admit that Federal Reserve Notes are legislatively mandated for “public” conduct and NOT private conduct, and 33 therefore are only for use internal to the U.S. government by instrumentalities and officers of the government. 34

“The states are prohibited from emitting bills of credit; but congress, which is neither expressly authorized nor expressly forbidden to do so, has, as we have already seen, been held to have the power of emitting bills of

35

36

The Money Laundering Enforcement Scam

78 of 79

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.044, Rev. 10-2-2013

EXHIBIT:________