Money Laundering Scam

Black’s Law Dictionary.

1

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

2

7. Admit that redeemability of Federal Reserve Notes ended officially in 1971 with Presidential Proclamation 4074. 3

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

4

8. Admit that Presidential Proclamation 4074 was issued under the authority of 12 U.S.C. §95a and 12 U.S.C. §95b, which 5 delegates lawmaking powers to the President ONLY in the case of national emergencies. 6

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

7

9. Admit that Presidential Proclamation 4074 is still in force, and therefore a state of national emergency is the ONLY 8 justification for continuing to suspend redeemability of Federal Reserve Notes in gold or silver. 9

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

10

10. Admit that NO national emergency justifies suspending any provision of the United States Constitution or creating any 11 new power within the national government. 12

“ Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency. What power was thus granted and what limitations were thus imposed are questions [290 U.S. 398, 426] which have always been, and always will

13

14

15

16

17

be, the subject of close examination under our constitutional system.

18

“While emergency does not create power, emergency may furnish the occasion for the exercise of power. 'Although an emergency may not call into life a power which has never lived, nevertheless emergency may afford a reason for the exertion of a living power already enjoyed.' Wilson v. New, 243 U.S. 332, 348 , 37 S.Ct. 298,

19

20

21

302, L.R.A. 1917E, 938, Ann.Cas. 1918A, 1024.

22

[Home Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)]

23

________________________________________________________________________________

24

“ No emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution. An emergency, however, while it cannot create power, increase granted power, or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon the power granted or reserved, may allow the exercise of power already in existence, but not exercised

25

26

27

except during an emergency. 126

28

The circumstances in which the executive branch may exercise extraordinary powers under the Constitution are very narrow. 127 The danger must be immediate and impending, or the necessity urgent for the public service, such as will not admit of delay, and where the action of the civil authority would be too late in providing the means which the occasion calls for. 128 For example, there is no basis in the Constitution for the seizure of steel mills during a wartime labor dispute, despite the President's claim that the war effort would be crippled if the

29

30

31

32

33

mills were shut down. 129 ”

34

[16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Constitutional Law, §52 (1999)]

35

126 Veix v. Sixth Ward Building &Loan Ass’n of Newark, 310 U.S. 32, 60 S. Ct. 792, 84 L. Ed. 1061 ( 1940) ; Home Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 54 S. Ct. 231, 78 L. Ed. 413, 88 A.L.R. 1481 (1934). The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency and its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the states were determined in the light of emergency, and are not altered by emergency. First Trust Co. of Lincoln v. Smith, 134 Neb. 84, 277 N.W. 762 (1938). 127 Halperin v. Kissinger, 606 F.2d. 1192 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 446 U.S. 951, 100 S. Ct. 2915, 64 L. Ed. 2d 807 (1980) and aff'd in part, cert. dismissed in part, 452 U.S. 713, 101 S. Ct. 3132, 69 L. Ed. 2d 367 (1981), reh'g denied, 453 U.S. 928, 102 S. Ct. 892, 69 L. Ed. 2d 1024 (1981) and on remand to, 542 F. Supp. 829 (D.D.C. 1982) and on remand to, 578 F. Supp. 231 (D.D.C. 1984), aff'd in part, remanded in part, 807 F.2d. 180 (D.C. Cir. 1986), on remand to, 723 F. Supp. 1535 (D.D.C. 1989), related reference, 1991 WL 120167 (D.D.C. 1991), remanded, 1992 WL 394503 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

128 Mitchell v. Harmony, 54 U.S. 115, 13 How. 115, 14 L. Ed. 75 (1851).

129 Youngstown Sheet &Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 72 S. Ct. 863, 96 L. Ed. 1153, 47 Ohio Op. 430, 47 Ohio Op. 460, 62 Ohio L. Abs. 417, 62 Ohio L. Abs. 473, 26 A.L.R.2d 1378 (1952).

The Money Laundering Enforcement Scam

74 of 79

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.044, Rev. 10-2-2013

EXHIBIT:________