Money Laundering Scam

information about certain transactions to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This information shall be

1

reported on the same form as prescribed by the Secretary.

2

(2) Currency received for the account of another. Currency in excess of $10,000 received by a person for the account of another must be reported under this section. Thus, for example, a person who collects delinquent accounts receivable for an automobile dealer must report with respect to the receipt of currency in excess of $10,000 from the collection of a particular account even though the proceeds of the collection are credited to the account of the automobile dealer (i.e., where the rights to the proceeds from the account are retained by the automobile dealer and the collection is made on a fee-for-service basis).(3) Currency received by agents — (i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section, a person who in the course of a trade or business acts as an agent (or in some other similar capacity) and receives currency in excess of $10,000 from a principal must report the receipt of currency under this section.(ii) Exception. An agent who receives currency from a principal and uses all of the currency within 15 days in a currency transaction (the “second currency transaction”) which is reportable under section 5312 of title 31, or 31 U.S.C. 5331 and this section, and who discloses the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the principal to the recipient in the second currency transaction need not report the initial receipt of currency under this section. An agent will be deemed to have met the disclosure requirements of this paragraph (a)(3)(ii) if the agent discloses only the name of the principal and the agent knows that the recipient has the principal's address and taxpayer identification number.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

[SOURCE: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR, Downloaded

18

10/2/2013]

19

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

20

2. Admit that a “trade or business” is defined in 26 U.S.C §7701(a)(26) as “the functions of a public office”. 21

26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26)

22

“ The term 'trade or business' includes [is limited to] the performance of the functions of a public office . ”

23

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

24

3. Admit that the rules of statutory construction FORBID adding anything to the above definition of “trade or business”. 25

“ When a statute includes an explicit definition, we must follow that definition, even if it varies from that term's ordinary meaning. Meese v. Keene, 481 U.S. 465, 484-485 (1987) (“It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term”); Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. at 392-393, n. 10 (“As a rule, `a definition which declares what a term “means” . . . excludes any meaning that is not stated'“); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lenroot, 323 U.S. 490, 502 (1945); Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 294 U.S. 87, 95-96 (1935) (Cardozo, J.); see also 2A N. Singer, Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory Construction § 47.07, p. 152, and n. 10 (5th ed. 1992) (collecting cases). That is to say, the statute, read “ as a whole, ” post at 998 [530 U.S. 943] (THOMAS, J., dissenting), leads the reader to a definition. That definition does not include the Attorney General's restriction -- “the child up to the head.” Its words, “substantial portion,” indicate the contrary.”

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

[Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000)]

35

“ Expressio unius est exclusio alterius . A maxim of statutory interpretation meaning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d. 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d. 1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute specifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects

36

37

38

39

40

of a certain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.”

41

[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 581]

42

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

43

4. Admit that one cannot lawfully execute “the functions of a public office” without in fact and in deed BEING a “public 44 officer”. 45

YOUR ANSWER (circle one): Admit/Deny

46

5. Admit that a Currency Transaction Report (C.T.R.) filed against those NOT lawfully engaged in a “public office” is a 47 FALSE report because it misrepresents the civil STATUS of the person it describes. 48

The Money Laundering Enforcement Scam

71 of 79

Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.044, Rev. 10-2-2013

EXHIBIT:________