Money Laundering Scam
26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26)
1
“ The term 'trade or business' includes [is limited to] the performance of the functions of a public office . ”
2
If the subject of such a reports is NOT lawfully engaged in an elected or appointed public office, then is impossible to commit 3 this crime. Ed Brown didn’t know this and never rebutted whether he was engaged in a “trade or business”, and therefore 4 was PRESUMED to be. This lead him to effectively be accountable for all the liabilities of a public office that he in fact did 5 NOT lawfully occupy, one of which was the money laundering reporting statutes. Learn the law so you aren’t unlawfully 6 victimized by government thieves, people. 7
"My [God's] people are destroyed [and enslaved] for lack of knowledge [and the lack of education that
8
produces it].”
9
[Hosea 4:6, Bible, NKJV]
10
8.2
Laundering of Monetary Instruments, 18 U.S.C. §1956
11
One of the most famous tactics a corrupted government uses to selectively enforce against freedom fighters is to 12 “selectively enforce” the money laundering criminal statutes. The enforcement of such statutes begins usually with the 13 filing of a usually FALSE Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) or Currency Transaction Report (C.T.R.) against a “person of 14 interest”. As we said in the previous section, CTR’s and SARs can ONLY be filed against those lawfully engaged in an 15 elected or appointed public office. If the subject of the report is NOT lawfully engaged in a public office, then: 16 2. The target of the false report is being made to criminally impersonate a public officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §912, 18 often without their consent or knowledge. 19 3. The submitter of the false or fraudulent report can and MUST be prosecuted. Among the crimes committed by 20 submitting a false CTR or SAR report include: 21 3.1. 18 U.S.C. §912: Impersonating a public officer. 22 3.2. 18 U.S.C. §1001: Statements and entries generally. 23 3.3. 18 U.S.C. §1005: Bank entries, reports, and transactions. Makes it a crime punishable by 30 years in prison and 24 a $1,000,000 fine to falsify any bank report. 25 4. Since the reports were false and the product of criminal activity on the part of the submitter, then they are 26 INADMISSIBLE as evidence in a criminal prosecution for money laundering or structuring because they violate the 27 U.S. Supreme Court’s Fruit of a Poisonous Tree Doctrine. See Wong Sun v. United States , 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 28 407, 9 L.Ed.2d. 441 (1963); Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States , 251 U.S. 385, 40 S.Ct. 182, 64 L.Ed. 319 29 (1920). 30 1. The CTR or SAR is false and fraudulent. 17
9 How financial institutions misrepresent and illegally administer money laundering statutes 31
9.1 Saying that federal law require an SSN or TIN in order to open an account or 32 COMPELLING the use or disclosure of SSNs or TINs 33
No federal law MANDATES the use or disclosure of an SSN or TIN for those who are NOT engaged in the “public office” 34 or “trade or business” franchise. People domiciled in a constitutional state all fit in this category. Only if they have a lawful 35 election or appointment to public office do they in fact become statutory “persons” or “individuals” subject to federal civil 36 law. Otherwise, they are nonresident NON-PERSONS and NON-INDIVIDUALS beyond federal jurisdiction. For 37 exhaustive proof on this subject, see: 38
Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons , Form #05.037 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
We discuss why the use of SSNs and TINS can only be compelled earlier in section 6. 39
9.2
FALSE CTRs and SARs
40
Currency Transaction Reports (C.T.R.’s) may ONLY be lawfully filed against those lawfully engaged in the “public officer” 41 and “trade or business” franchise. This is confirmed by 31 C.F.R. §103.30. 42
The Money Laundering Enforcement Scam
57 of 79
Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form 05.044, Rev. 10-2-2013
EXHIBIT:________
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker