Law of Consent (1 of 1)

It shouldn't come as a surprise that there are limits on our right and power to contract within a republican system of government. These limits apply not only to our private contracts with other sovereign entities, but also to our ability to delegate authority to the governments we created through the written contract called the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court said the following about these limits in respect to our ability to write "law" that can be enforced against society g e n e r a l l y : "In Calder v. Bull, which was here in 1798. Mr. Justice Chase said, that there were acts which the Federal and State legislatures could not do without exceeding their authority !from GOD. And among them he mentioned a law which punished a citizen for an innocent act: a law that destroyed or impaired the lawful private /labor/ contracts land labor compensation, e.g. earnings from employment through compelled W-4 withholdinel of citizens: a law that made a man fudge in his own case: and a law that took the property from A /the worker/. and nave it to B !the government or another citizen, such as through social welfare programs[. It is against all reason and justice.' he added. 'for a people to intrust a legislature with such powers. and therefore it cannot be presumed that they have done it. They may command what is right and prohibit what is wrong: but they cannot change innocence into guilt, or punish innocence as a crime, or violate the right of an antecedent lawful private 'employment/ contract: compelling W-4 withholding, for instance), or the right of private property. To maintain that a Federal or State legislature possesses such powers [of THEFT!] if they had not been expressly restrained, would, in my opinion, be a political heresy a l t oge ther inadmi s s i b l e in a l l f ree repub l i can , governments.' 3 Dall. 388.- [Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878)] In the quote below, the Supreme Court has also held that that no man can be compelled to participate in any government welfare or social benefit program. 121 second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use: and 131 third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation. [Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892)] Notice the Supreme Court held: "he shall not use it this property or labor or income! To his neighbor's injury, and that does not mean that he must /or can be required by the government use it for his neighbor's benefit". Since over 56% of all federal expenditures go to pay for social benefit programs (see section 1.12 earlier), then it also stands to reason that no one can be compelled to participate in the federal income tax that funds those programs. The secret the government uses to part a fool and his money through the fraudulent administration of the tax laws is item (2) in the quote above, whereby the lies of the IRS cause us to unwittingly donate our private property to a "public use" and give the government free control over it. This is what happens when we inadvertently connect our labor or assets to a "public office" or a "trade or business" by: 1. Filing information returns (IRS Forms W-2-1042-S, 1098, 1099) on ourselves which are FALSE in most cases. 2. Using government property, the Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number, in connection with our otherwise private labor. 3. Refusing to correct or remedy those who file false returns in our name in violation of 26 U.S.C. §7434 and 26 U.S.C. §7206. The prosecution rests its case, your Honor. 4. Filling out the wrong tax form such as the W-4 and thereby fraudulently misrepresenting ourself as a statutory government "employee" per 26 U.S.C. §3401(c ). "Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,-life. liberty, and the pursuit of happiness:' and to 'secure,' not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of. subject to these limitations: [U First, that he shall not use it to his neighbor's Wan , . and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor's benefit:

Requirement for Consent

23