KFLCC / New Age Bible Versions - Gail Riplinger

You will see how and why a modem translation produces vastly different verbal results.52

The vast difference between this Greek text type and most, mirrors the vast difference between paganism and Christianity. Yet they have become, in Webb's words,. .an accepted part" of liberal N.T. scholarship. The mandate to infiltrate has been followed so fully that these altered manuscripts are referred to today as "the originals" by Luciferians and liberal N.T. scholars. LUCIFERIAN NIV EDITORS

"This 'Pagan' view was shown in the original[s]. . .the English translation [KJV] being worthless."53 "The King James Version; as it is translated, has no resemblance whatever to the originals."55 Blavatskv

The KJV is "misleading. . .erroneous. . .corrupted by errors."54 "The King James Version... changed the originals... "56 Palmer "[T]he Textus Receptus contains so many significant departures from the original manuscripts of the various New Testament books that it cannot be relied on as a basis for translation."57 Youngblood

What spurs them to concur? The uncanny parallel between what these 'New' editors brew and Lucifer's 'New' Age view, will be uncovered herein through scores of quotes—matched as if hatched by the same name. This job, says Bob Larson, is Satan's:

There is a striking harmony in the way all false belief systems view truth. This is to be expected because all ideologies which are contrary to scripture originated from the same source—Satan.58