KFLCC Kingdom Law 2nd Ed.

NEMO BIS PUNITUR

813

NEMO EX SUO DELICTO

2 Sandf. (N. Y.) 568, 593; United Ins. Co. v. Scott, 1 Johns. (N. Y.) 106, 114. Nemo debet locupletari aliena jactura. No one ought to be enriched by another's loss. Dig. 6, 1, 48, 65; 2 Kent Comm. 336; 1 Karnes, Bq. 331. Nemo debet locupletari ex alterius in commodo. No one ought to be made rich out of another's loss. Jenk. Cent 4; Taylor v. Baldwin, 10 Barb. (N. Y.) 626, 633. Nemo debet rem suam sine facto aut defectu suo amittere. No man ought to lose his property without his own act or de fault Co. Litt 263a. Nemo duobus utatur officiis. 4 Inst 100. No one should hold two offices, i. e., at the same time. Nemo ejusdem tenement! simul potest esse bseres et dominus. No one can at the same time be the heir and the owner of the same tenement See 1 Reeve, Eng. Law, 106. Nemo enim aliquam partem recte in telligere possit antequam totum iterum atque iterum perlegerit. No one is able rightly to understand one part before he has again and again read through the whole. Broom, Max. 593. Nemo est bseres viventis. No one is the heir of a living person. Co. Litt 8a, 226. No one can be heir during the life of his an cestor. Broom, Max. 522, 523. No person can be the actual complete heir of another till the ancestor is previously dead, 2 Bl. Comm. 208. Nemo est supra leges. No one is above the law. Lofft, 142. Nemo ex alterius facto prajgravari de bet. No man ought to be burdened in con sequence of another's act 2 Kent Comm. 646. Nemo ex consilio obligatur. No man is bound in consequence of his advice. Mere advice will not create the obligation of a mandate. Story, Bailm. § 155. Nemo ex dolo suo proprio relevetur, aut auxilium capiat. Let no one be reliev ed or gain an advantage by his own fraud. A civil law maxim. Nemo ex proprio dolo consequitur ac tionem. No one maintains an action arising out of his own wrong. Broom, Max. 297. Nemo ex suo delicto meliorem suam conditionem facere potest. No one can make his condition better by his own mis deed. Dig. 50, 17, 134, 1.

properly rejected this as a rule of evidence. 7 Term R. 601. Nemo bis punitur pro eodem delicto. No man is punished twice for the same of fense. 4 BL Comm. 315; 2 Hawk. P. O. 377. Nemo cogitationis poenam patitur. No one suffers punishment on account of his thoughts. Tray. Lat Max. 362. Nemo cogitur rem mam vendere, etiam justo pretio. No man is compelled to sell his own property, even for a just price. 4 Inst 275. Nemo contra factum mum venire po test. No man can contravene or contradict his own deed. 2 Inst 66. The principle of estoppel by deed. Best, Ev. p. 408, § 370. Nemo dare potest quod non nabet. No man can give that which he has not Fleta, lib. 3, c 15, | & Nemo dat qui non nabet. He who hath not cannot give. Jenk. Cent 250; Broom, Max. 499»; 6 C. B. (N. S.) 478. Nemo de domo sua extrahi potest. No one* can be dragged out of his own house. In other words, every man's house is his castle. Dig. 50, 17, 103. Nemo debet bis puniri pro uno delicto. No man ought to be punished twice for one offense. 4 Coke, 43a; 11 Coke, 596. No man shall be placed in peril of legal penal ties more than once upon the same accusa tion. Broom, Max. 348. Nemo debet bis vexari [si constet cu riae quod sit] pro una et eadem causa. No man ought to be twice troubled or har assed [if it appear to the court that it is] for one and the same cause. 5 Coke, 61a. No man can be sued a second time for the same cause of action, if once judgment has been rendered. See Broom, Max. 327, 348. No man can be held to bail a second time at the suit of the same plaintiff for the same cause of action. 1 Chit Archb. Pt. 476. Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa. No man ought to be a judge in his own cause. 12 Coke, 114a. A maxim deriv ed from the civil law. Cod. 3, 5. Called a "fundamental rule of reason and of nat ural justice." Burrows, Sett. Cas. 194, 197. Nemo debet immiscere se rei ad se nihil pertinenti. No one should intermeddle with a thing that in no respect concerns him. Jenk. Cent p. 18, case 32. Nemo debet in communione invitus teneri. No one should be retained in a part nership against his will. Selden v. Vermilya,