Foundations of Freedom

"Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading constitutional rights" AFLCIO v. Woodard, 406 F 2d 137 t.

―In Land v. Dollar, 338 US 731 (1947), the court noted ―that when the government entered into a commercial field of activity, it left immunity behind‖ Brady v. Roosevelt, 317 US 575 (1943); FHA v. Burr, 309 US 242 (1940); Kiefer v. RFC, 306 US 381 (1939).

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. U.S. (5th Cir. 1956) 230 F.2d 486, 489.

"If the state converts a liberty [right to travel] into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity" Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, 373 US 262.

"An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government" Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94.

"Failure to obey the command of a police officer constitutes a traditional form of breach of the peace. Obviously, however, one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if that command is itself violative of the constitution" Wright v Georgia, 373 U.S. 284, 291-2.

"The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right" Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.